Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1

2011-05-20 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:30:52PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > HmmmSorry but this is the first time I've carefully looked at the > ReleaseGuide, otherwise if I saw it back when you threw it up on the wiki, > I'd probably have debated this convention for *artifact names* (note this

Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1

2011-05-20 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Okey dokey, in the interest of just getting the RC out and moving onto the next set of things to get done, RC 2 coming up... Cheers, Chris On May 20, 2011, at 6:43 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > RM docs are always guides, not decrees, but Marvin is > certainly within his rights to vote according to

Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1

2011-05-20 Thread Joe Schaefer
RM docs are always guides, not decrees, but Marvin is certainly within his rights to vote according to the current docs. Keep in mind noone gets to veto a release (unless it's on legal grounds, and those should be rare). FWIW, I think the full 3-part version string belongs in the package name, wh

Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1

2011-05-20 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Marvin, On May 20, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Hi, Chris, thanks for expediting. > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:18:37PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-lucy-0.1-incubating/rc1/ > > The artifacts here do not follow the version

Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1

2011-05-20 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Hi, Chris, thanks for expediting. On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:18:37PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-lucy-0.1-incubating/rc1/ The artifacts here do not follow the version naming convention that is used by the source code of X.Y.Z, and that the Re

Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1

2011-05-20 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Joe, hmmm...interesting I grabbed my old Nutch one and threw it into KEYS, but there's a chance that I have a newer Apache key. Let me check it out...thanks for the +1 regardless I'll update the KEYS file with the right one! Cheers, Chris On May 20, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >

Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1

2011-05-20 Thread Joe Schaefer
+1, with the caviat that the key in your keys file isn't the key you signed this package with. Please add you code-signing key to the KEYS file. - Original Message > From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" > To: "lucy-...@incubator.apache.org" > Cc: "lucy-u...@incubator.apache.org" ; >"gen

[VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1

2011-05-20 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Folks, I am proud to announce the first candidate for the Apache Lucy 0.1-incubating release. The source code is at: http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-lucy-0.1-incubating/rc1/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES file for details on release contents and latest cha