+1
Martijn
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers
+1
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.comwrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Deft to be an Apache Incubator project. Deft
is a non-blocking, asynchronous, event driven high performance web
framework running on the JVM.
Here's a link to the proposal in the
On 6/28/11 7:49 AM, berndf wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
+1
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:49, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers are changing
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
[X] +1, retire Bluesky for the time being
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1
Tommaso
2011/6/28 berndf ber...@apache.org
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers are changing frequently
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling
+1
I will also forward the vote message to
bluesky-priv...@incubator.apache.org and to J.Aaron Farr and Bill
Stoddard, listed as mentors as
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Yep, makes sense. Like I told Benson, I wasn't exactly sure if the mirroring
system were read only downstream of the Apache root sources (IOW, I thought
we had more control then in reality we did).
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hence the need for people to download KEYS files from an *.apache.org
domain that we do control. Putting KEYS in a distribution might cause
people to use them instead of getting them from a trusted source,
Hence the need for people to download KEYS files from an *.apache.org
domain that we do control. Putting KEYS in a distribution might cause
people to use them instead of getting them from a trusted source, and
that's bad.
The keys should be included in the web of trust, so it shouldn't
we copy a KEYS file into that directory upon succesful VOTE of the release
artifacts (which also include the KEYS file).
Perhaps, but the point we're getting at was explicitly stated by Benson,
The goal here is to allow and encourage consumers to independently verify
signatures. That calls
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to know how many signing keys are actually trusted which
have been used for our releases.
Quite a few, see http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/apache.html
BR,
Jukka Zitting
I would like to know how many signing keys are actually trusted which
have been used for our releases.
Quite a few, see http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/apache.html
Interesting - thanks for the link.
So, 53% of our software is signed with untrusted keys. I have expected
70% untrusted
Christian Grobmeier wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:20:13 +0200:
we copy a KEYS file into that directory upon succesful VOTE of the release
artifacts (which also include the KEYS file).
Perhaps, but the point we're getting at was explicitly stated by Benson,
The goal here is to allow
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:20:13 +0200:
we copy a KEYS file into that directory upon succesful VOTE of the release
artifacts (which also include the KEYS file).
Perhaps, but the point
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
Hi Dennis,
If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
these legacy
On 28 Jun 2011, at 09:53, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hence the need for people to download KEYS files from an *.apache.org
domain that we do control. Putting KEYS in a distribution might cause
people to use
On 28 Jun 2011, at 10:49, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I would like to know how many signing keys are actually trusted which
have been used for our releases.
Quite a few, see http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/apache.html
Aaargh!
That needs a health warning: pointing firefox at it just
I'm not sure what I think of your suggestion of having an ASF PGP key.
How about requiring committers to specify on id.a.o not just the last
few bytes of their key's fingerprints, but the whole fingerprint?
Nick Kew wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:43:24 +0100:
On 28 Jun 2011, at 09:53,
Passing along, from the ooo-dev list.
-Rob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
Date: 2011/6/28
Subject: Re: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal
To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org
Hi Rob,
i support your idea and i think that it make sense to
Hi Rob,
I'm a committer and PMC in the POI project and I'm interested in
integration with the ODF Toolkit.
Apache will be a good home for this codebase and many ASF projects
will benefit from it.
For POI I see the following potential benefits:
- have a common Java API to manipulate with
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
Hi Dennis,
If I
There's another possible dimension to this, which is related to the
'Apache Key' suggestion.
The current mechanism gives a\ sophisticated/ consumer tools to get
some confidence that what they downloaded was, in fact, created by
someone in the Apache infrastructure.
If a dozen black hats create
On 28 Jun 2011, at 13:22, Benson Margulies wrote:
There's another possible dimension to this, which is related to the
'Apache Key' suggestion.
The current mechanism gives a\ sophisticated/ consumer tools to get
some confidence that what they downloaded was, in fact, created by
someone in
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:49, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
The vote is open at least until 2011-07-02 12:00 UTC.
I'll extend the voting period until 2011-07-05 so the project has some
time to find new mentors.
Bernd
-
To
+1 (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:49 PM, berndf wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:52:58 -0400:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on
Nick Kew wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 14:13:51 +0100:
As of now, how would you know if I were to smuggle in a key
pretending to be yours and start signing things?
Don't stop here. If you can smuggle a signature into dist/ then
you can smuggle an artefact too.
Thanks Bertrand!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Yep, makes sense. Like I told Benson, I wasn't exactly sure if the mirroring
system were read only
+1
Ralph
On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:49 PM, berndf wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers are changing
+1
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers are
I don't have Internet access right now, except for ssh to my mail server.
Has anyone told the BlueSky project about this vote, yet?
I'm +1 for retirement, but feel that part of the process for retiring a
project should be notice to the project that retirement is being considered
and acted upon.
Thanks Ioannis, Emmanuel, Ashish and Bernd.
// Roger Schildmeijer
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1, sounds interesting. Good luck!
Bernd
On 28 Jun 2011 08:42, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011
Hi,
I added a requirement for podlings to report committer vote results to
our private list, indicating which mentors or Incubator PMC members
voted +1, which is a requirement for a valid podling committer
election.
See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1140654 for
details, and
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:49 PM, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers are
Hi everyone. I've contributed a few (mostly small) patches to Kafka in
the past and want to get more deeply involved. As I said below I have
also been a user of Kafka and active on the mailing list.
I've listed myself as an initial committer on the proposal
+1 For the proposal
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Roger Schildmeijer
schildmei...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ioannis, Emmanuel, Ashish and Bernd.
// Roger Schildmeijer
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1, sounds interesting. Good
Excellent! I have already voted on the proposal and I am looking forward to
the actual vote.
Also, what path would you recommend for those willing to contribute time
developing better documentation, testing or code?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Chris Burroughs
chris.burrou...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, Joe,
I'd expect people to contribute as any open source project : try/test the
code, discuss on the mailing list, create/comment on the jira, submit/review
patches, and become a committer.
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Joe Key joeandrew...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent! I
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the document in the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KafkaProposal
And here is a link
+1 (binding).
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to
+1 (binding)
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the document in the wiki:
+1
Sincerely,
J. Andrew Key (Andy)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1 (binding).
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator
+1
- Henry
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Joe Key joeandrew...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Sincerely,
J. Andrew Key (Andy)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1 (binding).
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM,
+1
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the document in
+1
Chris Burroughs
On 06/28/2011 01:00 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the document in the wiki:
+1
On 28 June 2011 22:30, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the document in the wiki:
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the
+1 (Binding)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the
+1
Nice work Jun :)
-Damien
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
... Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote
+1 (binding)
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe,
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
+1
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:49 PM, berndf wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers are
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi all,
Since the discussion on the thread of the Kafka incubator proposal is
winding down, I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a link to the document in
+1
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept Kafka for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to Kafka incubation
[ ] -1 Reject Kafka for incubation
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Mohammad Islam misla...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Oozie to be an Apache Incubator project.
Oozie is a server-based workflow scheduling and coordination system to manage
data processing jobs for
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Arvind
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Mohammad Islam misla...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Oozie to be an Apache Incubator project.
Oozie is a server-based workflow scheduling and coordination system to manage
data processing jobs for Apache
59 matches
Mail list logo
