Looks ok to me. In future releases it might be good to consider
including a release notes type file that mentions whats been updated
in the release.
+1
...ant
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We could use another vote or two,
Thanks!
Hello all,
I urgently need to remove some of my workload. Therefore I have
decided remove myself from any political debattes of the ASF. In
addition I have currently less fun in mentoring projects and need to
step back or go to idle mode which is affecting the incubator.
I have told the ooo
On 28 November 2011 02:56, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I think you missed a very important part of what I said, let me quote
the para you refer to:
[snip]
My point is we can't expect the mentors to
As people may have seen, I added a champion entry to podlings.xml.
In the case of current podlings only, the entry is listed in the
sponsor column under the sponsor name.
The entries were extracted from the podling status files that listed
their champion (not all do), and hopefully gradually
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...Assuming this goes ahead in some form:
Do we want to list both the initial champion (prior to acceptance) and
the current champion (during incubation; may be the same)?
Or should we just list the current (incubation)
On 28 November 2011 11:40, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...Assuming this goes ahead in some form:
Do we want to list both the initial champion (prior to acceptance) and
the current champion (during
Hello,
as I intend to step down as a mentor from Zeta Components, there are
only two mentors left. So this podling needs one more. Who is willing
to help out?
Cheers
Christian
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
Thanks for the feedback, I still have some questions.
1. Alan, this nunit license acknowledgement is missing from the NOTICE file
since RC1 and RC1 had the nunit files. Since cutting RCs is a significant
time investment, we'd appreciate if you could list all the concerns you
have once.
2. Sebb,
On 11/27/2011 3:34 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I think I've been leading a sheltered existence. In the TLPs of which
I play a part, over the 5 years or so that I've been around, I've
never seen a release proceed past a -1. Every single time, a -1 has
led to recutting the release.
That is
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it gets a single -1 vote.
A majority of +1's over -1's is required, obviously :)
Although this seems reasonable, do people on
On 11/28/2011 1:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it gets a single -1 vote.
And that isn't correct, as Joe was kind enough to point
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:56:59PM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
A majority of +1's over -1's is required, obviously :)
That would be sane, but that's not how I read this passage:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
Votes on whether a package is ready to be
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 28, 2011 7:01 PM, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Apache members,
Over the past 2 months, the Kafka Apache incubator project has been trying
to release its very first version in Apache. After 7 RCs, we are still not
done. Part of this is because most of us are new to the
On Nov 28, 2011, at 11:21 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/28/2011 1:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it gets a single -1
Thanks Alan for summarizing the issues!
We can perform all the other suggestions in a subsequent release.
Sebb also had a suggestion about release candidate tags. The kafka
community had discussed this and felt that creating a release tag is more
convenient to do when a vote passes. Until then,
Suggestion:
There are cases where the 'official word' is a full-ASF document which
we don't lightly edit. Yet, we see some evidence that podlings have
trouble reaching the right interpretation.
We don't want to duplicate, but we could supplement.
Specific proposal: I'm willing to try to write a
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:50 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
In which case, I suggest you post a clean message requesting feedback,
as this thread does not appear to be the right place for this now.
The link was to the last RC. -C
Hereby I would like to mark this vote closed with the following result:
4 IPMC +1 votes (Benson, Martijn, Chris A, Alan)
4 PPMC +1 votes (Francis, Rainer, Benjamin, Eike)
1 community +1 vote (Dimitar)
no -1 or +0 votes
Combined with our empire-db-dev@ vote round we can conclude this vote
On 11/28/2011 3:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 11:21 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
No - nobody can veto a release. But you also can't slip in a vetoed patch
and say this is a release vote, its not subject to veto. Well, as I had
hinted, the RM can withdraw a vote, which
The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a number
of Geronimo dependencies and associated code updates.
The code contributions have been attached to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6217
I've committed the IP Clearance form to the Incubator website --
Search for the two words: release veto
A top hit is http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
It has been that way for a long time.
It is the Release Manager who decides whether to halt a release.
They are guided by +1/-1 votes.
I cannot understand why people are confused on
On 29 November 2011 00:12, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
When Apache Forrest became a TLP, just prior to the Incubator starting,
there were no mentors to tell me stuff.
HeHe - and that's exactly where I learned it - although I was lucky
enough to have mentors within the project.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:12 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
I cannot understand why people are confused on those points.
Empathy is hard when you've forgotten what it was like to learn the
topic. There is a lot of documentation, but it is not curated. To
apprehend the topic, one
On Nov 28, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, I still have some questions.
1. Alan, this nunit license acknowledgement is missing from the NOTICE file
since RC1 and RC1 had the nunit files. Since cutting RCs is a significant
time investment, we'd appreciate if
Thanks everyone for the feedback. This is very constructive and helpful. We
will try to roll out a new RC accordingly.
We are grateful for all the help that we got from Apache members and are
proud to be part of Apache.
Jun
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ant - our dev list agrees that we should be adding some information
about what is being updated - we will include this in future releases.
With that, we have 3 votes we need, we appreciate your guy's time in revewing
our release.
~Prescott
27 matches
Mail list logo
