On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
... The cleanest way to handle that for
Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the
release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two didn't
participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect and needed
to be corrected, your response leads me to believe you
One of the mentors recently resigned: http://s.apache.org/2Ss
Chukwa has been coming out of a long, quasi-dormancy due to a
complicated set of upstream dependencies that weren't releasing the
features it required. It's discussed in the December report:
On 2012-01-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is ready for release.
This is very similar to our release at the end of November, however we
have used generics where appropriate to give it a better feel for .Net
developers.
SVN Tag:
On 2012-01-25, sebb wrote:
Various stemmers are mentioned in the LICENSE file; their license
appears to require a notice in the NOTICE file.
What Prescott said. The last release had notices and the Lucene.NET
community was told neither of those was required (so they were moved to
the
On 1/26/2012 5:57 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on
the release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two
didn't participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect
and needed to be
The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time to review
the release.
Result Summary for this List:
Binding IPMC Member Votes
+1 [0]
0[0]
-1[0]
Non-binding Community Votes
+1 [1]
0[0]
-1[0]
With the three IPMC member votes from mentors on the
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:57:08AM -0500, Ralph Goers wrote:
This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release.
Situations like this seem to be common.
My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether this podling
has sufficient mentors.
Perhaps the podling has an
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:57:08AM -0500, Ralph Goers wrote:
This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release.
Situations like this seem to be common.
My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether this
Mentor could lose interests in a project over time due to various kind of
reasons. Perhaps, It is time to deconstruct mentor idea and promote ppmc to
ipmc after making incubating release(s) and only allow incubator project to
graduate after promoted ppmc has mentored another project to make
10 matches
Mail list logo
