Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccòwrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remov
Hi Jukka,
On May 8, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the great report, Airavata! Sounds like you're doing fine.
>
> Based on your report I still classified Airavata as lacking enough
> diversity to graduate in near future, but I'm looking forward to
> hearing about new
On 8 May 2012 23:22, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Seeing INFRA-4767 ...
>
>> Need to update the website
>>
>> 1) List of VPs
>> Also, if a VP position changes, please update the web-site file at:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/index.html
>>
>> using the CMS application, or update:
>>
>>
>> https
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Comments inline
>
> Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
>>
>> On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Sebb,
>>> you can find my replies embedded below.
>>>
>>> I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus sta
Thanks so much for taking a look Matthias! We have releases in the
pipeline, so your continued involvement would be amazing!
With 3 binding +1 votes, 0 +0 votes, and 0 -1 votes, this release candidate
is promoted to a release!
Tally:
+1:
Matei Zaharia (non-binding)
Brian McCallister (binding)
T
Thanks for taking a look, Matthias! It's very much appreciated.
Matei
On May 8, 2012, at 2:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not that I want to (immediately) become a mentor here, but I am happy
> to oversee future release votes,
> and see if the community needs some other guidance et
On 05/08/2012 05:28 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
... I'm hoping that with the new committer (great!) you'll have a chance
to revitalize the project, but unless we start seeing some more
positive developments by the next report I think
Hi,
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>... I'm hoping that with the new committer (great!) you'll have a chance
> to revitalize the project, but unless we start seeing some more
> positive developments by the next report I think we need to start
> considering alternative exit s
Seeing INFRA-4767 ...
Need to update the website
1) List of VPs
Also, if a VP position changes, please update the web-site file at:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/index.html
using the CMS application, or update:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/foundation/
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Droids!
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> + Droids is an Incubator project arrived from Apache Labs. Droids entered
> + incubation on October, 2008.
That's 3.5 years of incubation, and unfortunately it looks like
community activity has yet to bounce
Hi,
Thanks for the great report, Airavata! Sounds like you're doing fine.
Based on your report I still classified Airavata as lacking enough
diversity to graduate in near future, but I'm looking forward to
hearing about new committers or other community developments already
in your next report. A
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On May 8, 2012 6:50 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>
> Well, the Wiki page explicitly says that the chair will assign.
To make sure they are all covered by at least one person, yes. However, I'm
pretty sure doubling would be good - mor
Well, the Wiki page explicitly says that the chair will assign.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> No such thing as "leftover". Doubling up (or more) is just fine.
>
> Q is whether there are some under-reviewed...
> On May 8, 2012 6:40 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>
>> I was la
No such thing as "leftover". Doubling up (or more) is just fine.
Q is whether there are some under-reviewed...
On May 8, 2012 6:40 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> I was late to volunteer. Do you have any leftover projects?
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> > I've done
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:32:32 -0400:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>> > Note also that Infra has already been involved.
>>
>> Yup. Saw.
>
> What's the infra issue here? I see no new mentions of big
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>> The output of Apache Bigtop (incubating) can be quite unusual since it
>> is a deployable production quality big data stack.
>
> What does it take to get a product into the Bigtop stack?
I was late to volunteer. Do you have any leftover projects?
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I've done my shepherd reviews and made one comment (about Amber) on
> this list). I'm not sure where you want general observations recording
> but I have moved the projects to the rec
Hi,
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I've done my shepherd reviews and made one comment (about Amber) on
> this list). I'm not sure where you want general observations recording
> but I have moved the projects to the recommended status category
That's perfect, thanks!
I'll
I've done my shepherd reviews and made one comment (about Amber) on
this list). I'm not sure where you want general observations recording
but I have moved the projects to the recommended status category
On 7 May 2012 21:03, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 5/4/2012 1:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> I
As a shepherd I just reviewed the Amber project. In my opinion this
project has been badly let down by the incubation process.
Here are my notes from the review:
Blocked from graduation by IP signoff from University of
Newcastle. Report asks for guidance. Why are mentors not providing
this? The p
The Apache OpenOffice Podling Project Management Committee is pleased
to announce the release of Apache OpenOffice 3.4, available on
Windows, MacOS and Linux.
Downloads are available at: http://download.openoffice.org
The full release announcement can be read here:
http://www.openoffice.org/news/
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
> The output of Apache Bigtop (incubating) can be quite unusual since it
> is a deployable production quality big data stack.
What does it take to get a product into the Bigtop stack?
I don't see any legal problems, but is vendor neutrality an i
Hi,
not that I want to (immediately) become a mentor here, but I am happy
to oversee future release votes,
and see if the community needs some other guidance etc.
-M
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Benjamin Hindman
> wrote:
>> Ca
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
> +1 swept for licensing and general organization of everything :-)
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matei Zaharia
> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Tested it on Mac OS X, seems to work fine.
>>
>> Matei
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
> you can find my replies embedded below.
>
> I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
> repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for
> 1.0.0-RC1-incubating from scratch.
>
> R
Hi all,
the vote [1] is canceled since the provided release artifacts did not
meet all requirements, as highlighted in the mentioned mail thread by
Sebb.
I am going to delete the staging repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesyncope-034/
and the SCM tag
https:/
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> They are proposing adding Hue, which is a Apache licensed project on
>> Github.
>
> Does Hue match the guidelines in http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
>
> If yes, then
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for
1.0.0-RC1-incubating from scratch.
Regards.
On 07/05/2012 14:47, sebb wrote:
On 7 May 2012 10:38
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:32:32 -0400:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
> > Note also that Infra has already been involved.
>
> Yup. Saw.
What's the infra issue here? I see no new mentions of bigtop on infra
list in the last day
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
> First, thank you very much for taking the time to write a thoughtful reply.
>
>
> On 05/08/2012 02:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>...
>>> as well as we don't
>>> distribute other Apache software either.
>>
>> I found a bunch of Apache software in ther
Hi,
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> They are proposing adding Hue, which is a Apache licensed project on
> Github.
Does Hue match the guidelines in http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
If yes, then it's fine by ASF policy for an Apache project to include it.
Is the
First, thank you very much for taking the time to write a thoughtful reply.
On 05/08/2012 02:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>> ...
>
> It seems that we're talking about this location:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/bigtop/bigtop-0.3.0-incu
33 matches
Mail list logo
