+1 (binding)
apart from the jQuery question it looks fine.
You might btw be carefull with the samples. If we publish a WAR which contains
other libraries, then this might be interpreted as 'distributing' them.
In OpenWebBeans, DeltaSpike and MyFaces we don't deploy them any longer in
binary
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Tomer Shiran tshi...@maprtech.com wrote:
I would like to create a Wiki page. Can you please grant me write access?
(alias tshiran)
Added to ContributorsGroup.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, Gary Martin gary.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
...
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
UTC on Thursday 9th August.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Gary Martin gary.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC
Hi,
The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
vote deadline:
+1: 7 (5 binding)
-1: 0
Details:
+1 IPMC:
acmurthy, phunt
+1 PPMC
kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
+1 wider community
Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
On 07.08.2012 13:14, ant elder wrote:
This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
people are continuing to vote +1 on the Syncope
On 08/07/2012 12:39 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 07.08.2012 13:14, ant elder wrote:
This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
people
Hi all,
even though we would have reached the required number of +1 from IPMC
members after the required 72 hours, I still have the feeling that we
are missing some consensus here.
I will now revert the current release candidate and start again from
scratch with another attempt.
Regards.
FYI: I have posted the proposal to the wiki and updated it based on the
feedback from Marvin and Jakob:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DrillProposal
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact, a big part of the motivation for proposing incubation before
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:14 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...
This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
people are
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:25 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Grant Ingersoll; Isabel Drost
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
recall any releases like that.
I know AOO had interactions with Legal regarding
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
recall
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:38 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
recall any releases like that.
As I replied to Marvin, Apache Roller had a hard
Hi,
[branching a discuss thread]
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
As I replied to Marvin, Apache Roller had a hard dependency on
Hibernate for some of its incubator releases. Allowing that was okay'd
by the IPMC, VP Legal, and the Board :-)
My view is that
On 07/08/2012 21:14, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:25 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Grant Ingersoll; Isabel Drost
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator
On
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
in
I concur with Andrzej. Let's see that VOTE Ted!
Otis
Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase -
http://sematext.com/spm
From: Andrzej Bialecki a...@getopt.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 5:51 PM
Hi Otis,
Nice! yeah, we're bootstrapping now... join us on blur-dev@i.a.o and
blur-user@i.a.o
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/blur.html
The ticket's in now to get the git repo up too.
Thanks,
--tim
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In
particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I would refer
you to:
Community looks well on the way to graduation. Congratulations on the
recent release.
There are a few things on the status page that need to be filled in and
processes [1] like suitable name search need to be completed prior to
graduation vote at the IPMC level.
I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the
Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion
over the last few days has been quite positive.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, bring Drill into Incubator
[ ] +0, I don't care either way,
[ ] -1, do not
Just sent that out.
Thanks for the encouragement!
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
I concur with Andrzej. Let's see that VOTE Ted!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the
Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion
over the last few days has been quite positive.
Please cast your
Ted,
Wasn't clear, can I add myself now?
thanks,
Arun
On Aug 6, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
Sounds like some good pull. I will call a vote tomorrow.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Agreed, likewise.
I'd love to get involved and
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
The incubator filters projects on the basis of the likeliness of them
becoming successful meritocratic communities. The basic requirements for
incubation are:
* a working codebase -- over the years
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Wasn't clear, can I add myself now?
Didn't the Incubator go back to discouraging open enrollment?
Is it OK to be invited in based on merit later, or do you feel that due to the
nature of this project, it's essential to
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the
Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion
over the last few days has been quite positive.
Please cast your
+1 (binding)
On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the
Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion
over the last few days has been quite positive.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, bring
29 matches
Mail list logo
