On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> IPMC, on the other hand, feels different since, practically speaking, the
> accumulation of the kind of merit IPMC cares for require *some* level
> of IPMC karma already.
There is an open question currently lingering on general@incubator
On 16 October 2012 16:31, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> My point is only that I'd prefer to give Roman, and people like him, a
>> +1 on the IPMC (assuming people vouch for him) than have someone else
>> voting +1 on a release without doing app
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> My point is only that I'd prefer to give Roman, and people like him, a
> +1 on the IPMC (assuming people vouch for him) than have someone else
> voting +1 on a release without doing appropriate due diligence.
If that's the easiest practical r
No need for a recount but Jukka is binding.
Next steps are documented at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#bootstrap
Some of these steps you can do yourself, some need to be done by one
of your mentors (or me as champion).
Item 1 is done.
I'll pick up items 2 and 3 and get them don
It had to be done, given this thread's epic proportions... ;)
[image: Identity]
http://xkcd.com/1121/
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm offering this discussion here, but it might need to go elsewhere
> if it goes anywhere at all.
>
> It seems to me that the there is
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> 1) send email to him and his PMC fellows, referencing this thread, as
> evidence that key signing is nice but optional.
This seems like the most sensible option.
AFAIK, signed keys have never been required to sign releases for Apache.
