Hi,
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...I think two more improvements are needed:
(1) PPMC members should be sure to record the votes of community members who
are not PPMC/committers and have no apache id.
(2) The header should include a reference to
my own +1
On 4 Dec 2013, at 20:48, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Dear all,
please cast your vote to accept Log4cxx for incation.
The proposal is pasted below, but can be found here too:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Log4cxxProposal
This vote will close in 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Accept Log4cxx
This vote passes with 4 +1 from:
* Chris Mattmann
* Marvin Humphrey
* Scott Deboy
* Christian Grobmeier
I am going to set up the new podling the next days.
On 4 Dec 2013, at 20:48, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Dear all,
please cast your vote to accept Log4cxx for incation.
The proposal is
I know you're passionate about this Marvin but as it stands I'll be
voting against this proposal.
1) This proposal doesn't help podlings with the first release
2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we
should more proactively do that) not stay to do more
3) The
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we
should more proactively do that) not stay to do more...
I wouldn't set this as a goal. It's nice when it happens, but as you
say the goal is for a
On 9 December 2013 22:04, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we
should more proactively do that) not stay to do more...
I wouldn't
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we
should more proactively do that) not stay to do more...
I
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:30 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...The point is i think that podlings learn
about the requirements but that doesn't mean we must block releases or
make people jump through hoops to do that learning...
I agree with that, and I don't think we're saying that
Christian is right. We are watching the lists and follow the discussions,
but do look for DISCUSS, VOTE, or MENTOR flags especially.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
Taylor,
your mentors should read the mailing lists. Why I would not expect to
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.comwrote:
Christian is right. We are watching the lists and follow the discussions,
but do look for DISCUSS, VOTE, or MENTOR flags especially.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 9 Dec 2013, at 6:05, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
So please instead of discussing again about procedures.
Just discuss about the release :-)
/me trying to rock the boat
Sirona has FIVE Mentors, plus another committer who is
Allura
(No shepherd review filed.)
Aurora
(No shepherd review filed.)
BatchEE
Marvin Humphrey (marvin):
Podling did not report. Please report next month.
Also, please edit podlings.xml metadata and address all
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
Let us now move to a vote.
Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
[] +1 Accept Phoenix into
+1 for Phoenix.
On 12/5/13 4:43 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
Let us now move to a vote.
Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
[] +1 Accept
Recasting my +1 (binding). It did not go previously.
Enis
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Doug Meil doug.m...@explorysmedical.comwrote:
+1 for Phoenix.
On 12/5/13 4:43 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
posting on
+1 (binding)
On 6 December 2013 14:12, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
Let us
+1
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 6 December 2013 14:12, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled
+1
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva supu...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 6 December 2013 14:12, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at
Hi All,
I'm writing regarding setting up Jenkins for Apache Stratos (incubating).
According to instructions given here [1] I tried to grant permissions to
one of the committers but it was not successful. I also wrote to Apache
Infra mail list but couldn't find any solutions.
Really appreciate
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding is that incubating releases can have small IP loose
ends, but not that they can proceed before the main clearance of an
initial code donation.
It would be good to establish some clarity around this
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:34 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I know you're passionate about this Marvin but as it stands I'll be
voting against this proposal.
I plan to propose this as an experiment which podlings would opt into.
Hopefully, I can persuade you not to oppose such an
21 matches
Mail list logo
