Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-16 Thread Henry Saputra
Thanks for the links Andrew, those are good insights. - Henry On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Andrew Phillips andr...@apache.org wrote: You might also want to have a look at how Scala itself deals with the issue of required binaries for the build:

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
[X ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-16 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi, although the basics looks fine: * keys checked * builds fine on a clean environment I got some warnings that should be fixed in future releases: * only key from one committer, without his apache email address * few dependencies retrieved from out of maven central * some libraries'

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread ant elder
Obviously +1 from me on doing experiments, and -1 for the silly policy update stuff. ...ant On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote: Greetings, As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting process, I propose that we run an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-16 Thread Patrick Wendell
* only key from one committer, without his apache email address I'll generate a key w/ my apache address for the next release. So far we've only had one release manager so there is only one key. * few dependencies retrieved from out of maven central This has been covered extensively in this

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread Dave Fisher
[X] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. I kinda feel it doesn't need the Policy change and at this point it should be the 2014 ... but hey - still a positive vote. Regards, Dave On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Greetings, As the next step in our ongoing

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating

2013-12-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
FYI we got the last missing IPMC binding vote. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sirona-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAN%3DtixmOspWgDXwVTfRiKvMK3kwBwRpiVrmzJ5xwKGiWDk3xfg%40mail.gmail.com%3E So the vote now passed the requirement of 3 IPMC binding vote SO the vote has passed. On 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-16 Thread Henry Saputra
NOTICE, LICENSE, and README files looks good. Checksum and signatures on the source jar looks good. Per comments by Marvin and sebb, Spark will resolve the included jar files in the source distribution in next release of 0.9 I am giving: +1 since this is 0.8.1 release which really hard to

[ANN] Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating

2013-12-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
The Apache Sirona Team is pleased to announce the first release 0.1-incubating of Apache Sirona project. Apache Sirona provide a simple but extensible monitoring solution for Java applications. It's an incubating project and a technology preview release. So some APIs can be change in the future.

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread Chip Childers
On Friday, December 13, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Please vote: [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. +1

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread David Crossley
Marvin Humphrey wrote: Please vote: [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. Here is my +1 -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread Till Westmann
+1 On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Greetings, As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting process, I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select podlings to earn binding votes under limited