no its wrong, it should all be under org.apache.hoya.
I had the hadoop prefix so that I could perhaps put it straight into the
hadoop code as another tools module -no need for incubation. But as the
actual providers and all tests are related to the deployment of hbase and
accumulo, it really
thanks, that's a great offer -lovely to have some management oversight from
others.
I've put your name down
On 8 January 2014 15:18, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Steve,
it looks interesting. It's a kind of advanced provisioning for Hadoop
cluster. I see some potential
Hi Steve,
Awesome, thanks.
Regards
JB
On 01/09/2014 10:20 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
thanks, that's a great offer -lovely to have some management oversight from
others.
I've put your name down
On 8 January 2014 15:18, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Steve,
it looks
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
The standard rules all apply to GSoC students. They should do their code
in as close to the standard way as possible (which would have precluded the
code being outside at this point) and they should file and ICLA
If the student provides it as a patch, then you are asking the usual
question about the quantity of code. There is no hard and fast rule,
but unless it's very large, the AL is very clear; patches sent to
mailing lists or attached to issue tracking systems or any of that are
covered by the AL. If
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies,
2014/1/9 Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
I agree - following the student's work should give you reasonable
assurance that the code is their own, and the intent of the student to
contribute the code to Apache should have been clear from the start,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...The SGA usually comes into play if the code is not the work and
property of an individual. The SGA allows some entity to grant the AL
unambiguously. If the code is the work and property of an individual,
the ICLA
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Alexander Broekhuis
a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
...What about IP Clearance? Does the same apply (we do know
the code is clean) and can we assume it is ok?...
If committers of the ASF project in question have followed the
development this is not very different
Ah yes, I missed the additional hadoop in the path.
Close enough :)
On Thursday, January 9, 2014, Steve Loughran wrote:
no its wrong, it should all be under org.apache.hoya.
I had the hadoop prefix so that I could perhaps put it straight into the
hadoop code as another tools module -no need
Mmmh, if i recall correctly this has come up in the past with other projects
and it was decided against it. Could you please check with the hadoop folks
about it?
Thx
On Jan 9, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote:
no its wrong, it should all be under
If you can work out a plan to do this directly in Hadoop, there's no
need for the incubator. You just build and and contribute it in
cahoots with them, and earn commit over there as you go.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Mmmh, if i recall correctly
I may have not been clear enough, I was referring to using
'org.apache.hadoop' as package prefix for a project other than hadoop.
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
If you can work out a plan to do this directly in Hadoop, there's no
need for
Hi Alejandro -
I believe that Steve has already acknowledged that a package rename is
required and that the project is likely not appropriate for Hadoop proper.
thanks,
--larry
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.comwrote:
I may have not been clear enough, I
Steve did already indeed.
Regards
JB
On 01/09/2014 06:23 PM, larry mccay wrote:
Hi Alejandro -
I believe that Steve has already acknowledged that a package rename is
required and that the project is likely not appropriate for Hadoop proper.
thanks,
--larry
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:46 AM,
argh, gmail trying to be extra smart collapsed his comment on that and i
missed. sorry
thx
Alejandro
(phone typing)
On Jan 9, 2014, at 9:23, larry mccay lmc...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Alejandro -
I believe that Steve has already acknowledged that a package rename is
required and that the
Thanks Jake.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
The github plugin is not installed in our jira, I would recommend that you
go with the csv route as Steve mentioned
-Jake
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Andy,
My wiki user name is AndrewPurtell. Please kindly whitelist also.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Steven Noels stev...@apache.org wrote:
same here - my user name for the Incubator Wiki is StevenNoels
Done --
Thanks Marvin,
my username is LarsHofhansl
Thanks.
-- Lars
From: Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org; lars
hofhansl la...@apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:38 AM
Subject: Re:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:27 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
my username is LarsHofhansl
It looks like sebb has whitelisted both you and Andrew. Thanks, sebb!
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Just a note to say I've updated the Aurora shepherd report to make it clear
that one of the four mentors (Jake Farrell) has been very active.
Thanks for being such a thorough shepherd, Justin. This email is
20 matches
Mail list logo
