[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread Hitesh Shah
Hello all, Closing the vote since 72 hours have passed. With the required 3 IPMC votes and no -1s, this vote passes. +1s (binding - IPMC ) Arun C Murthy Alan Gates Mahadev Konar +1s (non-binding) Hitesh Shah Chen He Daniel Dai Tsuyoshi Ozawa Rohini Palaniswamy Jonathan Eagles Siddharth Seth J

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread Hitesh Shah
Thanks for verifying it, @sebb. Just left it in there for now in case anyone wanted to double check. I will skip moving it when I migrate the bits to the release area. thanks -- Hitesh On Feb 28, 2014, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 February 2014 21:44, Hitesh Shah wrote: >> Thanks for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread sebb
On 28 February 2014 21:44, Hitesh Shah wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion, Sebb. I went ahead and moved the original SHA into > .sha file and re-generated the SHA1 into the .sha1 file. > > @Alan, @sebb, would either of you mind verifying the modified files? .sha1 now looks OK. Not sure its wort

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread Hitesh Shah
Thanks for the suggestion, Sebb. I went ahead and moved the original SHA into .sha file and re-generated the SHA1 into the .sha1 file. @Alan, @sebb, would either of you mind verifying the modified files? I will follow-up separately with other folks who did their +1's to re-check the files. th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread sebb
On 28 February 2014 19:48, Alan Gates wrote: > +1 > > One note is that the signatures given say sha1, but you actually have use > openssl sha to get the same values. If you do sha1sum (which was my first > assumption anyway) you get a different non-matching values. You might want > to change

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread Alan Gates
+1 One note is that the signatures given say sha1, but you actually have use openssl sha to get the same values. If you do sha1sum (which was my first assumption anyway) you get a different non-matching values. You might want to change the filename to "tez-0.3.0-incubating.tar.gz.sha” Othe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread Mahadev Konar
+1 (binding) - verified signatures and ran some sample test jobs. Mahadev Konar Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Jason Lowe wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Verified signatures > - Built from source, installed on single-node cluster > - Ran some sampl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread Jason Lowe
+1 (non-binding) - Verified signatures - Built from source, installed on single-node cluster - Ran some sample Tez jobs Jason On 02/25/2014 06:28 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote: Hello folks, I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc1). This is the second release for Tez. The previ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

2014-02-28 Thread Jonathan Eagles
+1 (non-binding) On Feb 27, 2014 7:25 PM, "Arun Murthy" wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Arun > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt fr