On Thu, Sep 25, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting
for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person
can block the adding of a candidate.
Do any projects use some form of majority voting for new
Hey Alex
If during a new committer vote someone is giving a negative vote then the
reasoning should be included with that vote and a discussion can follow
around why the person was given the negative vote, this should all occur on
the private@ mailing list for that project. If there is hesitation
On 25/09/14 19:19, Suresh Marru wrote:
If you need a mentor, count me in.
I actively contribute to Apache Airavata, and will be happy to bring our
experiences from a similar journey. Infact Ross queried on airavata lists few
years ago about potential taverna move to airavata/apache(Ross
Trying to build on Joes answer below
Given that the ASF is about consensus the vote for.at should be mostly
irrelevant. Nominations should have been thoroughly discussed before the vote
is called. The vote should be a formality required by the bylaws to demonstrate
consensus.
What I mean
As the primary author of the CouchDB bylaws, I will weigh in here.
Agree with Ross on the discussion stuff. We actually codify this
attitude in our bylaws.
http://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#decisions
Specifically, we (CouchDB) see voting as the failure mode of a
discussion (a useful one
It really depends on the project. I don't think there are enough cases of code
coming into an existing project via SGA to be able to say most projects. Fact
is most have never faced this issue. I could give you my personal opinion but
I'm pretty sure someone on this list would have a different
Hi Ross,
Yes, I am asking here because of lack of consensus in the Flex project.
In this particular scenario the Flex TLP has received a donation from
non-committers. I know one of our mentors mentioned that he was given
committer rights to different project for bringing in a code base after
OK. I will give you my personal opinion since you are seeking to drive
consensus...
I would say that if the code is of sufficient quality and relevance for the
project to want to accept it then contributors should be given commit rights.
The debate should really about whether they get PMC
Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
(that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
code bases written before my time):
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
OK. I will give you my personal opinion
Another way of wording this would be: the CouchDB community feels that for
non-technical decisions, a single -1 vote should never block a majority
consensus. The idea being that if the reasons for the -1 vote were
compelling enough, others would change their position.
It happened recently on a
On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
(that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
code bases written before my time):
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
On 26 September 2014 19:43, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Another way of wording this would be: the CouchDB community feels that for
non-technical decisions, a single -1 vote should never block a majority
consensus. The idea being that if the reasons for the -1 vote were
compelling
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting
for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person
can block the adding of a candidate.
Do any projects use some form of majority
We have discovered that we are unlikely to be able to trademark Apache
Optiq, so we intend to change the name of the project to Apache Calcite.
The PPMC likes the name, and a trademark search reveals no competing uses
of the name.
What are the next steps? Can someone who has been through the same
currently employed by SoftwareAG. Raghavendra Singh from InMobi has built
the QA automation for Grill.
What kind of QA environment does Drill/Lens have currently? How much
do you expect to need going forward?
--David
-
To
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to propose Silk as an Apache Incubator project. The new
proposal is added to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SilkProposal and
is duplicated below.
Hi Cos:
Are there any other resources that Ignite will
Hi Julian,
we just renamed fleece to johnzon so maybe i can help:
- Check for the new name: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html
- We voted on the dev list for the new name
- Open a issue like this one to get approval from @trademark
Drill uses standard sorts of CI infrastructure.
Lens (was Grill) is something I don't know about and they are the ones who
might have something unusual.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:44 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
currently employed by SoftwareAG. Raghavendra Singh from InMobi has
On Sep 26, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com wrote:
we just renamed fleece to johnzon so maybe i can help:
- Check for the new name: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html
- We voted on the dev list for the new name
Still consensus building but will move to
Thanks, Andy, and all who responded and volunteered (yay!).
I'm sure Shoaib will respond, but as I have been the main maven and build
guy on the project I guess I should also chip in. I'll try to find time to
respond properly to the excellent questions next week, in between my baby
duties. Some
Thanks David makes sense to me and thank you for explaining
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 26, 2014, at 12:59 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Guys,
-Original Message-
From:
Lens has the functional test suite that includes cube ddls, queries, test
data, scripts etc that requires standard build and test infra.
On Sep 27, 2014 3:45 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
currently employed by SoftwareAG. Raghavendra Singh from InMobi has built
the QA automation for
We have updated the proposal with the section of
Comparative analysis to relevant projects
which addresses the questions expressed below.
Regards,
Cos
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:21PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
Hi Cos,
Looks like a good start of the proposal.
How would this project relate
Hi David.
I believe it will be needing a usual place to publish releases and perhaps
some CI time-share on builds.apache.org, but I am sure the latter could be
addressed by using different resources if it seems to be an issue.
Regards,
Cos
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:50PM, David Nalley wrote:
24 matches
Mail list logo
