Not sure, and maybe a bit pedantic, but is the NOTICE file a little thin
(practically non-existent) given the number of 3rd party libs present? I'm not
an expert on what is required there, but when I compare it to projects I'm
familiar with like Solr and Mahout, they are vastly different.
I
I had a look, since I was just dealing with NOTICE for another
project. The key is whether copies of the third-party libraries are
distributed. In the case of Drill, yes there are loads of 3rd party
jars distributed in jars/; they are not just Maven deps referenced in
pom.xml.
I am sure this will
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Not sure, and maybe a bit pedantic, but is the NOTICE file a little thin
(practically non-existent) given the number of 3rd party libs present? I'm
not an expert on what is required there, but when I compare it to
Is it correct, then, to say that if Drill does not bundle any GPL licensed
libraries, we do not need any additional info in the NOTICE?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
OK, let me clarify as sebb has asked so that the vote can proceed.
The git commit to be voted upon:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-optiq/commit/6801257324d7515f91c61877a0edd0863c0433f5
Its hash is 6801257324d7515f91c61877a0edd0863c0433f5.
The artifacts to be voted on are
On 10 October 2014 18:59, Julian Hyde jh...@apache.org wrote:
OK, let me clarify as sebb has asked so that the vote can proceed.
Thanks very much, the new text is very good.
The git commit to be voted upon:
The standard practice has been drifting in incubator-land.
When I brought this up previously, I was told a few things,
1) the notices required by BSD like licenses apparently should appear in
the LICENSE file.
2) notices in the source distribution only need to include things that are
included
Sean,
Are you talking about the src distribution after doing the build?
Before doing the build or after [mvn clean], there are no jars in the
distribution.
Videlicet:
*ted:apache-drill-0.6.0-incubating-src$ mvn -q
cleanted:apache-drill-0.6.0-incubating-src$ find . -name
No I just went straight for the binary distribution:
http://people.apache.org/~smp/apache-drill-0.6.0.rc0/apache-drill-0.6.0-incubating.tar.gz
This contains the third-party jar files in jars/.
I assume http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html is still the
law of the land so to speak and
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
The standard practice has been drifting in incubator-land.
There's hardly any daylight between what Roy was recommending 8 years
ago and what we recommend today. (NOTICE should be minimal, only
bundled bits get documented
10 matches
Mail list logo
