On Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
Hi all,
The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating).
This will be the second release since the project entered incubation in
May 2014 as Optiq, and the first under the new
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean
jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...However votes on releases are more about the source release and
binaries releases are just a convenience so I don't see that as a blocker...
To clarify, the ASF only releases source code - votes on releases are
On 13 October 2014 03:28, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 12.10.2014 14:24, sebb wrote:
On 11 October 2014 20:15, c...@apache.org wrote:
Author: cos
Date: Sat Oct 11 19:15:17 2014
New Revision: 1631099
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631099
Log:
Updating Ignite website with initial
On 13 October 2014 10:06, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean
jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...However votes on releases are more about the source release and
binaries releases are just a convenience so I don't see that as a
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
... If the ASF mirrors are used to distribute convenience binaries, AIUI
these must still meet the following basic criteria...
I tend to agree and wanted to make sure this is clearly documented, so
I reread the following:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Any redistribution must obey the licensing requirements of the contents
so you are right that our binary redistributions need to be checked as
well, but as far as incubating projects are concerned it is IMO
Regarding Apache RAT. I think we have that covered already. RAT is run if you
specify the apache-release maven profile, and therefore is run automatically
when we make a release. You can run it standalone using
mvn -Papache-release verify
As Ted notes, a few exclusions are needed. The
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
make sure
podlings understand the difference between source code releases and
convenience binaries.
Based on recent discussion, a
Hi Incubator PMC members,
Apache Sling has received the donation of a resource editor module.
See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-resource-editor.html
for the details.
Please vote to approve this contribution.
This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours and lazy consensus
For many projects, especially library projects, the convenient binaries
that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are
deployed to the maven repo. Calcite releases in fact do not currently include a
binary tar ball, only a source tar ball and maven jars.
Are
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Julian Hyde julianh...@gmail.com wrote:
For many projects, especially library projects, the convenient binaries
that matter most these
days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are deployed to the
maven repo...
...Are these jars subjected to due
Thanks Justin, as you can tell from the log I pasted, I tried that
solution (unpacking the release, and using the KEYS file inside,
but I was unable to verify it). Can you see below? Any ideas?
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief
Hi,
we have a few wiki pages on GitHub we'd like to move to the ASF
infrastructure. For that, we'd need a wiki. How does one go about getting
one?
Thanks,
Markus
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Any redistribution must obey the licensing requirements of the contents
so you are right that our binary redistributions need to be
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
First, the signing key is present in SVN, but has not been uploaded to
the
standard key-servers, nor has it been signed by anyone.
I found it here:
https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=Julian+Hydeop=index
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Based on recent discussion, a review of this distinction would be
valuable
for many at Apache.
I very much second this. I think bringing some clarity at least into the
areas of:
#1 rules for complete source
I suggest that the release manager and anyone else in the KEYS file should
have added key fingerprints to their Apache profiles at
https://id.apache.org/.
This will have their PGP keys refreshed regularly under their Apache ID at
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/.
With regard to an
Hi Markus
You can get a wiki setup by creating an infra ticket [1], available options
are MoinMoin or Confluence
-Jake
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/infra
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Markus Weimer wei...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
we have a few wiki pages on GitHub we'd like
Hi,
thanks! Is there a notion of one being the old one and another being the
new one? We come with no baggage and would like to use whatever is
considered to be the future :-)
Thanks,
Markus
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Markus
You can get a
On 12 October 2014 17:40, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:16 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that's correct.
Well, since neither of us is a lawyer (at least I am not) at this
point we're debating interpretations on ALv2.
A source distribution
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Julian Hyde julianh...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me that each of those jars is a de facto binary release.
Definitely not.
An official release by the Apache Software Foundation consists of source code
which has been audited by a PMC. Of course it is not
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Justin Mclean
jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Even if the key is part of a web trust it may not be part of everyone's web
of trust. I'd see that as a hard requirement to meet.
The last time this came up, Daniel Shahaf suggested an excellent solution:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:14 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
4. presence or absence of NOTICEs in source distribution doesn't
affect binary distribution.
Not true.
Ditto.
If you are saying that the NOTICE in an ASF binary release has no
direct bearing on the NOTICE in
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
The Foundation was not set up to take on the liabilitiy associated with
binary
releases:
http://s.apache.org/roy-binary-deps-3
How is that different from any of our other projects? End users
don't
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
Even if the key is part of a web trust it may not be part of everyone's
web
of trust. I'd see that as a hard requirement to meet.
The last time this came up, Daniel Shahaf suggested an excellent solution:
On 13.10.2014 16:14, Julian Hyde wrote:
For many projects, especially library projects, the convenient binaries
that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that
are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite releases in fact do not currently
include a binary tar ball,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Excellent. More eyes on these issues is great. Thanks for spending your time
on this.
+1
Sean and I have continued our conversation offline and were able to clarify
some aspects of our (very
It is up to each project on which they prefer, MoinMoin came first and is
available at [1], Confluence is the newer setup of the two and is available
at [2]
-Jake
[1]: https://wiki.apache.org
[2]: https://cwiki.apache.org
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Markus Weimer wei...@apache.org
For the record, I did register my key fingerprint at https://id.apache.org
and my key is present at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/jhyde.asc.
And it was before the release was made. So, I am surprised that it did not
show up in a search.
Julian
On Oct 13, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Dennis E.
My search was on the key servers, by using pgp.mit.edu. The issue was that
you, ironically, can't seem to search by key id.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Julian Hyde jh...@apache.org wrote:
For the record, I did register my key fingerprint at https://id.apache.org
and my key is present
Hi Markus,
You can file an INFRA ticket, here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
Just select Wiki (suggestion: use CWIKI or
Confluence, not MoinMoin).
Once that¹s filed, we can track and make sure it gets
implemented hopefully quickly. Also, see here:
31 matches
Mail list logo
