Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-21 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
+1 from me (binding). Congrats guys! ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: c

[VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-21 Thread Tomer Shiran
Hi Everyone, We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Drill dev list in which the community expressed its desire to graduate to a top-level project. That vote passed with 23 +1s (http://bit.ly/1tcrHVS) and 0 -1s (including the project's mentors, PMC members and committers, as well as IPMC members). T

Re: Convenience Binary Policy

2014-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Binary dependencies are, by definition, not released by the ASF; because > we release source code. Also, software that has dependencies that are > only available in binary form is not open-source, in my book. You may possibly be forgetting about Category B licensed dependancies. These may

Re: Convenience Binary Policy

2014-10-21 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Harbs wrote: > The one thing I see missing from the proposed text is dependencies and > installers. > > Particularly this section: > > ### Compiled packages ### {#compiled-packages} > > The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases

Re: Convenience Binary Policy

2014-10-21 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > At this point, unless someone not on the Flex PMC says that we can’t make > the modifications, I understand that your deadline is today, thus you are operating in emergency mode and within what you have determined individually is within the bo

Re: Convenience Binary Policy

2014-10-21 Thread Branko Čibej
On 21.10.2014 15:55, Harbs wrote: > The one thing I see missing from the proposed text is dependencies and > installers. > > Particularly this section: > ### Compiled packages ### {#compiled-packages} > > The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases > are in the form

Re: Convenience Binary Policy

2014-10-21 Thread Harbs
The one thing I see missing from the proposed text is dependencies and installers. Particularly this section: ### Compiled packages ### {#compiled-packages} The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make changes t

Re: Convenience Binary Policy

2014-10-21 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/21/14, 5:57 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > >The problem is that we lack a concise policy document. That's where the >"ASF >release policy codification proposal" as worked through on legal-discuss >a few >months ago is supposed to help. > > http://s.apache.org/aGm > https://github.com/r

Re: Convenience Binary Policy

2014-10-21 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> P.S.: Why anyone would think voting on binaries makes any kind of sense >> around here is, of course, a different question. I can't even begin to >> count the number of times it's been pointed out that binaries are not >> Apache release

Re: Convenience Binary Policy

2014-10-21 Thread jan i
On 21 October 2014 07:26, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 21.10.2014 06:34, Alex Harui wrote: > >> What is the piece I’m missing that says we have to vote to update the > >> binary package? > > > > Apparently the Flex community believes that