I may be taking a more cynical interpretation, but when I see that three
votes from members are required that means that all other votes don't
matter.
On Mar 2, 2015 10:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Remember this is not a replacement for the IPMC, it is an
Hi!
since a few board members requested a detailed document
outlining the exact policy of a pTLP project, I've created this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51812862
which is modeled after the Incubator policy document. My rationale
is this: if the level of
Roman,
I don't think much is missing. One of my concerns with all of these
proposals, especially for participants like myself, is the difference in
how the IPMC operates vs how these PMCs must operate. For someone like me,
I wouldn't be able to help these pTLP's the way I can on the IPMC.
From
Remember this is not a replacement for the IPMC, it is an alternative for
appropriate projects. The problem you highlight is the one that concerns me
most about this proposal. However, if we select pTLP candidates carefully there
should be no problem.
Also note that you are incorrect in saying
Thanks Roman - I asked for karma before (not your fault) but
no one granted it for me. I’ll take a look. Great job.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet
I obviously speak for the minority, but as a non-Apache Member I would
never be able to provide a binding vote in a pTLP.
We just had a case where the 4 IPMC representatives are made up of 1
current IPMC Member, 2 IPMC non-members and 1 Member pending IPMC.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:05 PM Ross
How do you see yourself being limited in the support you can provide?
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: John D. Amentmailto:johndam...@apache.org
Sent: 3/2/2015 6:56 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org; Bertrand
Can you please remove the requirement for 3 legally independent PMC members.
What we require is a PMC that operates as a meritocracy. This is possible even
in a monoculture PMC. It's also possible to have the independent
representatives that act in collusion.
3 independents was a useful
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:26 PM, moon soo Lee m...@apache.org wrote:
May i get edit access to incubator wiki to fill out the March report for
the Zeppelin project.
id: MoonsooLee
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe,
We used default apache-release profile for source distribution which is
producing zip.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding). Checked disclaimer, license, notice. Verified
signatures. Checked for headers. Ran unit tests.
Out of curiosity, why
May i get edit access to incubator wiki to fill out the March report for
the Zeppelin project.
id: MoonsooLee
Thanks,
moon
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Alex abezzu...@nflabs.com wrote:
May I get edit access
Thanks Roman,
I think that it is unnecessary to mention sub-projects in this document.
If an external codebase and community are going into an existing TLP, it is
often possible to do so via an IP Clearance process, depending on size of
external community.
// Niclas
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:31
If that were true then the project would not be operating as an Apache project
which requires that all community members have a voice. Graduation requires the
project be operating as an Apache project.
In such a project there is a difference between a binding vote and a
non-binding vote only
+1 (binding). Checked disclaimer, license, notice. Verified
signatures. Checked for headers. Ran unit tests.
Out of curiosity, why is the src release a zip file rather than tgz?
-Jakob
On 1 March 2015 at 22:32, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
...either this pTLP idea is independent of the IPMC. Or it is not
I think it is actually in between ;-)
While the pTLP itself, once created by the board, is independent of
the Incubator PMC, the
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
...the steps that lead to the board voting on the pTLP
creation resolution are IMO best handled by the Incubator PMC, as they
are fairly
+1
Rob
On 27/02/2015 19:19, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi general@,
Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a
proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance
into the Apache Incubator. Having worked our way
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
...The Incubator PMC might not have a
formal say in pTLP creation, but there's significant work that happens
before that, collaboratively and in public.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
...either this pTLP idea is independent of the IPMC. Or it is not
I think it is actually in between ;-)
While
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
...the steps that lead to the board voting on the pTLP
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org
...The Incubator PMC might not have a
formal say in pTLP
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
...The Incubator PMC might not have a
formal say in pTLP creation, but
22 matches
Mail list logo
