Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

2015-06-14 Thread Joe Witt
Niclas, I agree that the scope could be improved. It is a tough balancing act of course. How would about this modification: WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project

RE: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

2015-06-14 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
I'm +1, please feel free to carry my +1 through to the VOTE. Cheers, Chris From: jan i [j...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:04 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator thanks for

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

2015-06-14 Thread jan i
Hi Sorry for top posting, I do understand why the resolution is being changed, however it this really the correct place to do it. The community must be behind and agreeing to the resolution, so changes should in my opinion by discussed on your dev@ list. The IPMC should be presented with a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

2015-06-14 Thread jan i
On 14 June 2015 at 17:52, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: The community agreed on what we posted originally. Just trying to be responsive to niclas concerns in the spirit of the discussion thread. I was not suggesting otherwise. I have forwarded the thread to our dev list which is where

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

2015-06-14 Thread Joe Witt
Adjusted to clarify the 'realtime' reference which can be misleading: WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

2015-06-14 Thread Joe Witt
The community agreed on what we posted originally. Just trying to be responsive to niclas concerns in the spirit of the discussion thread. I have forwarded the thread to our dev list which is where the adjustment to 'interactive' came from. Should these minor rephrasings give pause in the nifi

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

2015-06-14 Thread Niclas Hedhman
It is less generic, but I think I am not in a position to determine what is suitable. The community + mentors should be a better group to discuss it. On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Niclas, I agree that the scope could be improved. It is a tough balancing

Re: June report prep

2015-06-14 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Hi, Ted, Do you need someone else to finish and file the report? Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-14 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Wow, thank you so much to all of you for the great feedback you have provided about this proposal and specifically about the community concerns (thank you Martin for raising this topic, it was good to address this here after it was briefly discussed at Apache Barcamp@Austin), license, releases:

Re: June report prep

2015-06-14 Thread Ted Dunning
I can get it tonight. This last week has been crazy. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 14, 2015, at 20:36, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Hi, Ted, Do you need someone else to finish and file the report? Marvin Humphrey