Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > > ... > > Binding -1s (4): > > Greg Stein > > Ralph Goers > > Roman Shaposhnik > > Konstantin Boudnik ... > > Please

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

Thanks Owen (and apologies for missing your vote: I swore I saw it at the time, then checked the thread twice and somehow missed it). The updated results are below: Binding +1s (18): Todd Lipcon Arvind Prabhakar Chris Mattmann Julien Le Dem Carl Steinbach Brock Noland

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

RIght. That's why I call it "opt-out" rather than opt-in. If there is no active community to opt out, then I see no problem with us picking up the codebase and (re)forming a community around it. With ALv2 licensing on the codebase, I believe we have most of the rights we need, but will continue

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > ... > Binding -1s (4): > Greg Stein > Ralph Goers > Roman Shaposhnik > Konstantin Boudnik ... Please indicate how the issues that are behind these -1s have been addressed. I might have missed something,

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

This vote is now closed and passes with 17 binding +1 votes, 7 non-binding +1 votes and 4 binding -1 votes. Thanks to everyone that voted! Here is my tally of the votes: Binding +1s (17): Todd Lipcon Arvind Prabhakar Chris Mattmann Julien Le Dem Carl Steinbach Brock

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

I contributed to this project a little bit (as an outside consultant) back when Cisco was running it, and would be interested in staying involved with it if this happens. Phil This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Greg Stein wrote:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

Not that it changes the result, but I also voted +1. https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg52096.html .. Owen On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > This vote is now closed and passes with 17 binding +1 votes, 7 non-binding > +1 votes

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 12/01/2015 11:37 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > > On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz > > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Greg, > > May I suggest a compromise? Enter incubation with no explicit commit > policy and let the community choose a commit policy if and when they see > fit. > The community already discussed it and made a choice. They'll

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: >... > On 1 December 2015 at 14:46, Daniel Gruno wrote: > >... > > Given as we have no actual incubator policy that states whether > > consensus is required or not - or at least none that I could

Re: [DISCUSS] S2Graph Incubator Proposal

Hongbin, Thank you Hongbin for your interest. Your backgroupd seems to be an expert about graph processing and very helpful for S2Graph. We are welcome to contributions. I'm looking forward to your contribution to S2Graph. All, Jira, wiki, mailing list, and git repository currently are

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: >... > As far as I can tell from the proposals and DISCUSS, RTC was the process > already present in the community proposed. If the -1 folks would like to > convince the community to change its approach then they should take

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > > ... > > Binding -1s (4): > > Greg Stein > > Ralph Goers > > Roman Shaposhnik > > Konstantin Boudnik ... > > Please

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

Greg, May I suggest a compromise? Enter incubation with no explicit commit policy and let the community choose a commit policy if and when they see fit. Julian > On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On 1 December 2015 at 14:46, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 12/01/2015 11:37 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > > On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz > > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson > wrote:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On 1 December 2015 at 15:22, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > >... > > > On 1 December 2015 at 14:46, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > >... > > > > Given as we have no actual incubator policy that

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache incubator

The vote for accepting Kudu into the Incubator has now closed. The vote count is as follows: +1 (binding): 29 +1 (not binding): 9 -1 (binding): 2 The full list of voters is reproduced below. Apologies if I mistakenly counted a binding vote as non-binding (had to check the IPMC members list for a

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On 12/01/2015 11:37 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: >>> ... >>> Binding -1s (4): >>> Greg Stein >>> Ralph Goers >>> Roman

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

Hi, Can any other IPMC member help out here? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

The only mention of consensus I could find is in the actual development of the actual proposal. I’m sure one could argue that that implies that whether consensus is achieved is by the vote, but with a group as large as the IPMC it would be horrible to allow a single vote to block a podling from

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

A few thoughts from a 'bystander': It's great that Greg and the others who disagree cast their dissenting votes. That doesn't mean that we should throw out process. If the process is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry stated. Greg even stated (if I understand his statements

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > The only mention of consensus I could find is in the actual development of > the actual > proposal. I’m sure one could argue that that implies that whether consensus > is achieved > is by the vote, but with a group

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

Niall Thanks for digging up the reference I knew INFRA had made the change for a reason but couldn't remember the reasoning Rob On 01/12/2015 16:18, "Niall Pemberton" wrote: >On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey >wrote: > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Thanks for the good suggestion, Bertrand. I've included your paragraph in the background section of the proposal. .. Owen On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > ...To

Access to wiki for project report submission

Hi, I would like edit access to the wiki so that I can add the project report for Apache Samoa for December 2015 due tomorrow. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2015 Thank you for your help! Nicolas Kourtellis

Re: Access to wiki for project report submission

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Nicolas Kourtellis wrote: > Hi, > > I would like edit access to the wiki so that I can add the project report > for Apache Samoa for December 2015 due tomorrow. > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2015 > > Thank you for your help!

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Rob Vesse wrote: > I seem to remember that INFRA used to do redirects but decided to stop > doing them because it made the transition to TLP easier for podlings post > graduation because their "final" URL was active from as soon as they start

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:06 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > I'm interested as well, particularly given the ties to Storm. > > I'd be happy to volunteer as mentor and/or committer if it would be > welcome. I have some familiarity with both projects (obviously one more so > than

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote: >... > It's great that Greg and the others who disagree cast their dissenting > votes. That doesn't mean that we should throw out process. If the process > is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry stated.

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

Yes, INFRA arguments are completely valid. But rather than the DNS resolution of the domains, I think Marvin was asking how domains are handled at the HTTP level. Niall Thanks for digging up the reference I knew INFRA had made the change for a reason but couldn't remember the reasoning Rob On

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Owen, Given that the majority of this code was produced as a work-for-hire, wouldn't it be good to get some sign off from Cisco on this migration? On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Hi all, > > We'd like to start a discussion proposing creating Metron

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Sree V wrote: > +1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree > > > On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:21 PM, Reynold Xin > wrote: > > > +1 >

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

I seem to remember that INFRA used to do redirects but decided to stop doing them because it made the transition to TLP easier for podlings post graduation because their "final" URL was active from as soon as they start (assuming they don't name change during incubation) Pretty much any of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Hi Owen, On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > ...The > condensed version is that the original code base (OpenSOC) was created by a > company (Cisco) that put it on github as ALv2, but then hasn't been working > on it. We posted a message >

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

Well, the transition is not that hard if: a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301) to podling.a.o right? On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Rob Vesse wrote: > I seem to remember that INFRA

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Hi Bertrand, Taken in the opposite case, is there someone from OpenSOC objecting to this code being forked? It doesn’t sound like there is a community there. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

Think I've missed the vote window, but +1 binding I will repeat what I raised when the proposal first came up, something that wasn't addresses at all: ZeroMQ is LGPL, which is forbidden as a mandatory dependency in ASF projects. Step 1 of the project is going to have to confirm that the

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Hi Chris, On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > ...Taken in the opposite case, is there someone from OpenSOC > objecting to this code being forked?... It doesn't look like anyone is objecting, but if we can reasonably find out who owns that code it's fair

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Owen, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > ...The > > condensed version is that the original code base (OpenSOC) was created > by a > > company (Cisco) that put

Re: Grant wiki access for iandunlop

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Ian Dunlop wrote: > Could you add iandunlop to the contributors list for the incubator wiki > please. Done. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Grant wiki access for iandunlop

Hello, Could you add iandunlop to the contributors list for the incubator wiki please. Cheers, Ian -- Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab School of Computer Science The University of Manchester http://orcid.org/-0001-7066-3350 - To

Re: how can i find PMC Chair for a incubator project

Michael, This is something to ask of your mentors. Removing dev@comm (bcc) and moving to general. they can either grant or ask for karma on private MLs. John On Dec 1, 2015 03:40, "Michael Wu" wrote: > Hi Mentors, > > I'm a member of project "incubator-eagle", I need to

[IP CLEARANCE] Sling Pipes

Hi, Apache Sling is receiving code for a new Sling Pipes module. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-pipes.html Please vote to approve this contribution. This is a lazy consensus majority vote, open for at least 72 hours. -Bertrand

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > ...To avoid forking communities, you need to either have: > * the community wants to move to Apache > * the community is dead or inactive > > There is a pretty compelling evidence that OpenSOC is currently inactive... Ok,

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns: > > http://podling.incubator.apache.org > http://podling.apache.org > > See for example: > > http://systemml.apache.org/ >