Hi folks,
Thanks for taking time to review especially during the holidays and vote on
this release ! The vote passes
with four binding +1's, 3 non-binding +1s .
Binding:
Arun C Murthy
Justin Mclean
Seetharam Venkatesh
John D Ament
Non-binding:
Harish Butani
Shwetha Shivalingamurthy
Suma Shivapr
January 2016 Incubator report timeline:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2016
Wed January 06 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun January 10 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun January 10 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue January 12 -- Mentor signoff due by end
Perhaps once way to deal with this is to formally vote on the RC so that it
is official, even if it keeps the RC name.
John
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:15 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Have a look through Apache's offical _Release Policy_ and _Release
> Distribution Policy_ documents
Howdy
We are definitely open to make this public when Hadrian gives us the green
light
As for a name, we have proposed some names including "Iota". My understanding
is that asf has to accept it?
Thanks
Reza
www.litbit.com
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> The logic i
Hi Daniel,
Have a look through Apache's offical _Release Policy_ and _Release
Distribution Policy_ documents.
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution
Those policy documents (not the accompanying FAQs, just the Policies) are
canonical.
On
The logic is that the project afaik is not open source and the code not
publicly available. Until the project is accepted in the incubator I see
it fair to respect its current private status.
The code was provided to the ASF in good faith by litbit. I will note
that it wasn't Tony's express re
On 30/12/2015 14:55, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We at project FreeMarker intend to issue a Release Candidate under
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/. Note that it's just
> "dev", not "release". There will be both source and binary RC release
> artifacts. As I understand, t
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea
wrote:
> The code was already made available. Since the project is not yet accepted
> in the incubator, we thought it best to not publish it.
What is the logic behind that decision?
Hi Roman,
The code was already made available. Since the project is not yet
accepted in the incubator, we thought it best to not publish it. Because
you expressed interest I sent you a private mail with the code location.
Tony needs to decide on the proposed name, it is unlikely that the
pro
Hello,
We at project FreeMarker intend to issue a Release Candidate under
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/. Note that it's just
"dev", not "release". There will be both source and binary RC release
artifacts. As I understand, this so far doesn't require any voting, as
it will be t
10 matches
Mail list logo
