Hi all,
The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache
SINGA 0.2.0 (incubating).
The vote thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAJz0iLtBLSr3AZ%3DJVPedBkK%3Dhtpw8vQKax%3DvkrcORCzAcDXneA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
and the result
+1
Everyone should read the subject and reset.
If IPMC members having nothing better to offer than "give up" then please
refrain from offering your advice to mentors asking for constructive help.
That is not to say projects should linger, but unless mentors advise it we
should not be interferi
Technically Julian, I brought this issue up to the incubator, but I am glad
that my impressions of concerted aren't too far off.
Generally speaking, while not necessarily a requirement, the purpose of the
quarterly report is to see that the podling continues to make progress. If
the IPMC sees tha
(Removing dev@concerted from the To: list.)
Good grief. No one is suggesting there should be "steady activity
requirement". I and other Concerted mentors just have a hunch that the
project isn't doing well, and thought it would be better to bring our
concerns to this list earlier rather than later
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Chris Nauroth
wrote:
>
> As a Concerted mentor, I agree with the concern about lack of activity. I
> think this was a difficult month for the project considering both the
> general drop in participation and the typical drop in activity that we
> should expect to h
Apologies for the prior spam. That was a mishandled list admin email.
As a Concerted mentor, I agree with the concern about lack of activity. I
think this was a difficult month for the project considering both the
general drop in participation and the typical drop in activity that we
should expe
The Apache Slider team is proud to announce Apache Slider incubation release
version 0.90.2-incubating
Apache Slider (incubating) is a YARN application which deploys existing
distributed applications on YARN,
monitors them, and makes them larger or smaller as desired - even while the
applicati
On Jan 7, 2016 20:48, "John D. Ament" wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I wanted to get others opinions. Currently Freemarker creates two
> artifacts - one is a GAE compatible module, the other is a regular
> library. They are created from two distinct branches in their SCM. Are
> those artifacts voted on to
