Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

As an engineer that's not an expert at legal stuff I was wondering if there isn't a way to solve this with tooling ? I've seen a few Maven plugins out there but they don't seem to work properly, especially for binary distributions. I've started a plugin myself here [1] but it's still in heavy

Re: Ideas regarding System and network programming projects

Hi Bertrand, Thanks for the feedback. I understand Apache is a big organization and all projects operate independently and that's one of the reasons I chose to post here. I have little to no experience in the projects related to networking because we are asked to work on projects related to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hi John, > > Thanks for testing it out and reporting the test failure. The error is > not expected based on previous testing but it’s great to get results from > different environments. You don’t happen to have an entry

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Hi, >> But better conventions on the format and content of the files that would >> make automated processing easier would also be a great thing, but that >> might be too late already. > > Right, the hardest part of this problem is the spec, which SPDX provides. SPDX looks good - how there been

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

Hi, > I mean the BSD license makes you advertise the Copyright Notice and there's a > better > chance of it going downstream via NOTICE. The source file will have the header which contains the copyright notice so it will still be there, perhaps just not as obvious unless it listed in license.

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> I mean the BSD license makes you advertise the Copyright Notice and there's >> a better >> chance of it going downstream via NOTICE. > > The source file will have the header which contains the copyright notice

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

Hi, > Well, that's the problem -- the source doesn't have it. It should as the first couple of line of the BSD license header are like so (from a file I happen to be looking at at this instance): /* * Copyright (c) 2015, Nordic Semiconductor ASA * All rights reserved. * * Redistribution and

Making license adjustment tools publicly available

Hi! a podling recently asked me why: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/ https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl are only available to commiters. I see no reason why, but of course I'm appreciative of the warning here:

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> can you please take a look at this and see if that's acceptable: >> https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/LICENSE >> https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/NOTICE >>

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > What we put in NOTICE is policy right rather than a > legal requirement so I guess 3rd parties can do just about anything and > that’s OK? The Apache License 2.0 doesn't restrict what can go in NOTICE. You could

Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source license on software which is expected to remain private, or otherwise restricted

Re: New ASF visual identity

This indeed looks good! BTW, I tried putting in a comment on Wikipedia's ASF page but evidently didn't do it correctly, as it was reverted for being "non constructive." But, if this is indeed our new logo, then ought it not be promulgated to Wikipedia? louis On 4 February 2016 at 02:46, Gregory

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Serge Huber wrote: > As an engineer that's not an expert at legal stuff I was wondering if > there isn't a way to solve this with tooling ? If you're going to go this route, I suggest taking a look at SPDX: http://spdx.org/about-spdx Our

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retire Ripple

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > I plan to hold off on closing down the Ripple development resources > until after the trademark issue is resolved to the point that it no > longer needs to be discussed on the Ripple dev and private lists. (I >

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

On 2/4/16, 3:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >A fair number of non ASF Apache software is usually missing a NOTICE file >or has other issues. What do we do when you bundle a non ASF Apache >license software that is missing a NOTICE file? Nothing or be a little >more

Re: [VOTE] Retire Corinthia

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > I will attend to the administrative details of Corinthia's retirement. The steps to retire Corinthia have been completed. Marvin Humphrey - To

Re: Retirement guide updates

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:00 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I believe doap was retired in the projects-new setup. Since there have been no objections, I've made the following change: r1728601 |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Thanks for clarifying this Justin. Filed GEODE-914 to clean this up. Anthony > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> NOTICE contains copyright, commons-io [2] > > It’s my understanding that for an ASF produced product with the name, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 (binding) - carried over from dev vote. — Hitesh On Feb 4, 2016, at 12:36 AM, Thomas Weise wrote: > Hi, > > Please vote on the following Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating release > candidate. > > The Apache Apex PPMC has voted to release this candidate. > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating (RC2)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. Thomas Weise February 4, 2016 at 0:36 Hi, Please vote on the following Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating release candidate. The Apache Apex PPMC has voted to release this candidate. The community vote passed with 5 binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 (binding), carried over from dev list. - Verified signatures. - Verified checksums. - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE look good. - Full build and test run was clean. - RAT check found no problems. - No binary files found in the source distro. --Chris Nauroth On 2/4/16, 12:36 AM, "Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 (carried over from dev voting). Thank you, Vlad On 2/4/16 00:36, Thomas Weise wrote: Hi, Please vote on the following Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating release candidate. The Apache Apex PPMC has voted to release this candidate. The community vote passed with 5 binding votes from the

Re: Ideas regarding System and network programming projects

Gaurav, How about a project to extend Apache Drill to directly query network capture files? I have this on my team's small demo to-do list, but I would be happy it somebody else were to do it first. I have a moderately complete spec available. This can easily be done in the required time, is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating (RC2)

Hi, +1 binding (carried over from dev list). Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating (RC2)

Hi, Please vote on the following Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating release candidate. The Apache Apex PPMC has voted to release this candidate. The community vote passed with 5 binding votes from the PPMC (including 3 votes from IPMC members). There were another 11 committer votes in favor of

Re: Ideas regarding System and network programming projects

Hi, On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Gaurav Shukla wrote: > ...Some of the ideas given by our > faculty are listed below, please refer to them and suggest accordingly... The Incubator is the wrong place for this - Apache projects operate in large part independently of each