Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Reza Rahman wrote: > Yep, understood. We will give it an honest effort > No doubt, we appreciate the sincerity. Note that there are multiple aspect that would require license grants and provisions that complicate any Java-ecosystem grant

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

Having chatted around the 0mq community in the past; I've confidence in their desire to move to MPL; and 26/32 committers is a great step forward. You raise a good reservation though John - if you remove the blocker on the usage side, it's easy for the licensing to remain as is. I'm +1 for

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

To be clear, we are talking about: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Reza Rahman wrote: > Yep, understood. We will give it an honest effort. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 3, 2016, at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament

Re: Need access to Incubator Wiki

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Gino Bustelo wrote: I need access to be able to push Apache Toree updates. If you can let us know your username for the incubator wiki (register if you haven't already - it doesn't use your main apache credentials), then one of us can grant you the karma Nick

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

Sorry, misread the revision I was looking at. The intent to move to MPL was done on March 22 2014, 2 years ago this month, not December 2013. John On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:41 PM John D. Ament wrote: > I have some reservations with what you're proposing, and would like

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

I have some reservations with what you're proposing, and would like you to consult w/ legal-discuss on this first. There's a difference between what Mynewt did and what you're proposing. Specifically, this was a transitive dependency that they relied upon indirectly, so its more of a call out for

Re: [VOTE] Release taverna-language-0.15.1-incubating-RC5 and taverna-osgi-0.2.1-incubating-RC5

Hi, Sorry it -1 binding due to Category B software in a source release. [10] I checked: - artefacts contain incubating - signature and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is good however it lists Category B software - NOTICE is good - There are a couple of binary files (under the test

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

Obviously I need to take this up in earnest after Friday. In the meanwhile let me know what I need to do in order to get myself setup for this. Anything that is worth it is never easy. This matters enough to try and there are many that will be with us, even inside Oracle. > On Mar 3, 2016, at

Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

Wanted to give folks an update on our progress with dealing with JeroMQ, an LGPL package that enables us to communicate via 0MQ. The 0MQ community is very aware of the issues with LGPL (LGPLv3 + static link exception) and it is their intention to try to move projects to MPL v2. This is not an easy

Need access to Incubator Wiki

I need access to be able to push Apache Toree updates.

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

Yep, understood. We will give it an honest effort. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 3, 2016, at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > You need to start with convincing oracle to provide an SGA for the entire > glassfish codebase. Your best bet is to start that before you leave