[DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

2016-05-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi all, We would like to discuss about a new proposal for the incubator: CarbonData. CarbonData is a new Apache Hadoop native file format for faster interactive query using advanced columnar storage, index, compression and encoding techniques to improve computing efficiency, in turn it will

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2]

2016-05-18 Thread Gary
Hello incubator PMC, The Apache Mnemonic community has voted and approved the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.1.2 (incubating). Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storages oriented library, it proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model that brings several advantages to

Re: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Luciano Resende
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi Mike, > > > > it's what we are doing at Beam. > > > > A PR submission result: > > - to a mail on the mailing list > > - to a

Re: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Christopher
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Mike, > > it's what we are doing at Beam. > > A PR submission result: > - to a mail on the mailing list > - to a comment in Jira (if the PR contains commit with issue ID). > > The GitHub integration is very

RE: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Mike Jumper
On May 18, 2016 10:06 AM, "Steve Varnau" wrote: > > Infra can configure the github to mailing list & github to JIRA for you. > > In trafodion, we have all github PR and comments going to a codereview mail > list >

RE: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Steve Varnau
Infra can configure the github to mailing list & github to JIRA for you. In trafodion, we have all github PR and comments going to a codereview mail list http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-trafodion-codereview/ So there is a catch-all, even if the PR title is not in the correct

Re: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 05/18/2016 07:00 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > On May 18, 2016 9:54 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> it's what we are doing at Beam. >> >> A PR submission result: >> - to a mail on the mailing list >> - to a comment in Jira (if the PR contains commit with

Re: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Mike Jumper
On May 18, 2016 9:54 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > it's what we are doing at Beam. > > A PR submission result: > - to a mail on the mailing list > - to a comment in Jira (if the PR contains commit with issue ID). > How have you achieved this? For

Re: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Sterling, FYI, at Beam (again ;)), we discussed with Infra to have a mergebot account and automatically trigger PR merging. Regards JB On 05/18/2016 06:56 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote: Hi Mike, On 5/18/16 11:51 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: Hello all, Does anyone here have any experience with

Re: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Sterling Hughes
Hi Mike, On 5/18/16 11:51 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: Hello all, Does anyone here have any experience with using GitHub pull requests in a code review workflow which leverages a podling's mailing lists? Since things have only happened if on the mailing lists, it'd be nice if PR activity could

Re: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Mike, it's what we are doing at Beam. A PR submission result: - to a mail on the mailing list - to a comment in Jira (if the PR contains commit with issue ID). Regards JB On 05/18/2016 06:51 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: Hello all, Does anyone here have any experience with using GitHub pull

GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Mike Jumper
Hello all, Does anyone here have any experience with using GitHub pull requests in a code review workflow which leverages a podling's mailing lists? Since things have only happened if on the mailing lists, it'd be nice if PR activity could truly "happen" as well. I'm specifically interested in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

2016-05-18 Thread Velmurugan Periasamy
Thank you Justin. Cleaned up the license file as this library is not being used anymore. Please let us know if further changes are required. https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/LICENSE.txt On May 18, 2016, at 3:10 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

2016-05-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > LICENSE.txt - > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > NOTICE.txt - https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/NOTICE.txt Not looked in detail, but I will tomorrow when I get some time. I did notice there’s a MPL licensed software mentioned in

[VOTE] Release Apache CommonsRDF 0.2.0-incubating RC3

2016-05-18 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi, I am pleased to post a RC3 for CommonsRDF (Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating for a public VOTE. CommonsRDF 0.2.0-incubating RC3 is available for review at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/commonsrdf/0.2.0-incubating/ Maven artifacts are here: