Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

+1 (binding) We will address the LICENSE and NOTICE points mentioned by Justin for next release. Thanks Regards JB On 06/12/2016 01:54 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: Hi everyone, Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version 0.1.0-incubating! The complete staging area is

Re: [DISCUSS] DistributedLog Incubation Proposal

Sravya, Thank you for the interest and willingness to help. We definitely looking for more contributors as the projects coming to ASF. Being mentor is not necessary requirement to help a podling as you probably already know. Looking forward to see you in the community :) - Henry On Saturday,

Re: DISCUSS: Trafodion for TLP

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Stack wrote: > We'd like to solicit feedback on whether the Trafodiion project is ready to > go TLP. I am the project Champion writing on behalf of the project PMC. > > Our clutch report is nice and healthy [2]. Our up-to-date status page can > be

Re: Looking for mentors

Hi, > If each graduating podling provided 2 or 3 mentors (or one person prepared to > mentor 2 or 3 projects) the problem would be solved. Not all graduating projects have people who can act in an official mentor role i.e. you need to be IPMC and that generally means being a member. Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

Hi, +1 (binding) IMO license issue need to be fixed for the next release. I checked: - file name of release contains incubating - while signature checks out, there’s no KEYS file in the list area and there seems to be no key on file for the release manager [1] However there is a KEYS file in

Re: Looking for mentors

On Jun 11, 2016 21:37, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > > FWIW: I'm still a big fan of having a cap on the # of podlings a single mentor > > could have > > I have a self imposed cap and I’m currently at capacity so sorry can’t help out. Perfect point, everyone has

Re: Looking for mentors

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > If each graduating podling provided 2 or 3 mentors (or one person prepared to > mentor 2 or 3 projects) > the problem would be solved. It would be a (virtuous) pyramid scheme and the > incubator could grow

Re: Looking for mentors

The Incubator PMC has 242 members. Assuming 3 mentors per project that means we would need 80 projects before duplicating a member, given that each PMC member acted as a mentor. On Jun 11, 2016 21:46, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > If each graduating podling provided 2 or 3

Re: Looking for mentors

If each graduating podling provided 2 or 3 mentors (or one person prepared to mentor 2 or 3 projects) the problem would be solved. It would be a (virtuous) pyramid scheme and the incubator could grow indefinitely. Julian > On Jun 11, 2016, at 18:40, Roman Shaposhnik

Re: Looking for mentors

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> FWIW: I'm still a big fan of having a cap on the # of podlings a single >> mentor >> could have > > I have a self imposed cap and I’m currently at capacity so sorry can’t help > out. Yup. Make two of us!

Re: Looking for mentors

Hi, > FWIW: I'm still a big fan of having a cap on the # of podlings a single mentor > could have I have a self imposed cap and I’m currently at capacity so sorry can’t help out. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

If you have a functioning community around Commons Math already, why do you feel you need Incubation? People on a Math TLP would come out of the Commons PMC and simply submit a Board Resolution, and I doubt that there would be any objects. There are no legal concerns, no community training, no

Re: Looking for mentors

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > (Off-topic) At some point we may need to discuss our incubation capacity... > People present cool proposal and they get vote just because that, without > checking our available resources. FWIW: I'm still a big fan of

[VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

Hi everyone, Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version 0.1.0-incubating! The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [1], and * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven

Re: [DISCUSS] DistributedLog Incubation Proposal

@Sijie: As I am not an IPMC member, I am not eligible to be a mentor. I am figuring out if I can still contribute in some way informally. Will keep you posted. So no, I do not think you should add me to the proposal. Thanks for your interest though! On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Sijie Guo

Re: Looking for mentors

Agree that podlings which have recently graduated might be able to provide good advice having just been through the experience. Although, how common is it to have IPMCs in the newly graduated podlings? Is there a way for folks who are not IPMCs yet to give back in terms of informally mentoring

Re: [DISCUSS] DistributedLog Incubation Proposal

Thanks Eitan for adding me. Sravya, cool! I am glad that you are interested in mentoring this project. Shall I add you to the proposal? Sijie On Saturday, June 11, 2016, Eitan Adler wrote: > + some people explicitly > > On 10 June 2016 at 12:42, Sravya Tirukkovalur

RE: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Afternoon James I would ping Bill Barker, Mikkel Andersen, Sebastian Brissard or any math committer from the base project http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/team-list.html HTH Martin __

Re: [DISCUSS] DistributedLog Incubation Proposal

+ some people explicitly On 10 June 2016 at 12:42, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > Excited to see DistributedLog come to ASF! > > I see that you already have good list of nominated mentors. As a member of > recently graduated project, I can offer mentorship(informal) as well if >

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

I meant PPMC, yeah. On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Interesting. Does this mean migrating Commons Math to a math PPMC (not > IPMC)? > > Would the scope be the same? > > Would Commons Math go to the Attic? > > Is there some problem that this

RE: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Interesting. Does this mean migrating Commons Math to a math PPMC (not IPMC)? Would the scope be the same? Would Commons Math go to the Attic? Is there some problem that this is meant to solve? How is it a solution? - Dennis PS: I have labored through the dev-commons thread on [Math]

[ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

We (the Commons PMC) have not decided yet what to do, but I just wanted to gauge the interest in joining the math IPMC if we choose to go TLP by way of the incubator. The idea would be that math (whatever its name may be), would go through the incubator in order to enrich its community prior to