Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating

Hi, Sorry but it -1 binding due to a war file in the source release [1] The war file contains compiled jar files. Everything else is fine and if that file wasn’t there I would vote +1. I checked: - name includes incubating - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

> On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Thanks Leif. > > I’m going to go check them out, but I wonder why it was discussed > on private? Likely my mistake, I just let it auto-complete the address. — Leif

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Jun 21, 2016 7:06 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck! > > Sijie Guo wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting >> DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. >> >> [] +1 Accept DistributedLog

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating

+1 (non-binding) On 6/21/16, 7:28 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: >Hi folks, > >This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release >0.91.0-incubating. This release candidate, 0.91.0-incubating-RC0, has >successfully passed a vote for a release on the Apache Slider

[VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating

Hi folks, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating. This release candidate, 0.91.0-incubating-RC0, has successfully passed a vote for a release on the Apache Slider developer mailing list. Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! James Bognar wrote: Hi all, It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! Sijie Guo wrote: Hello All, Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator [] +0 Abstain. [] -1 Do not accept DistributedLog into the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

+1 Niall On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:10 PM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a > vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. > > For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

Thanks Leif. I’m going to go check them out, but I wonder why it was discussed on private? Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

> On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Hmm, I missed the convo on infrastructure@. > > Do you have a pointer to it? It was on infrastructure-private@. Cheers, — leif

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

Hmm, I missed the convo on infrastructure@. Do you have a pointer to it? Thanks, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

> On Jun 17, 2016, at 4:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Leif, > > I doubt this is something IPMC can help you with. As champion, I would > recommend that you reach out to infra to see the appetite to support > git-dual on a podling. You will want to explain the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a > vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. > > For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at >

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

It seems we only need one more Mentor to check the boxes! https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal#line-258 That said, I'd also love to get some more feedback from this list about the proposal if anyone can spare the cycles. Cheers! Benjamin -Original Message- From: Benjamin

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Craig > On Jun 21, 2016, at 10:10 AM, James Bognar > wrote: > > Hi all, > > It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a > vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. > > For those who are interested the DISCUSS

[VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

Hi all, It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at

Re: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

:-) Congrats and more to come! :) ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email:

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hello All, > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

@Niall, Thanks for your interest. Other current ideas for development 1) MessagePack support. 2) YAML support. 3) Convert microservice API to be OSGi-based. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, James Bognar

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hello All, > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On 21 Jun 2016, at 08:29, oz...@apache.org wrote: > > +1(non-binding) > > Looking forward to DistributedLog project's joining Apache Incubator! > > Thanks, > - Tsuyoshi > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sijie Guo [mailto:si...@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016

RE: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

Wow. We’re so excited about this and we’re looking forward for the hard work toward full foundation membership. Thanks all! Josh From: Lewis John Mcgibbney [mailto:lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 9:20 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Poore, Joshua C.

RE: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1(non-binding) Looking forward to DistributedLog project's joining Apache Incubator! Thanks, - Tsuyoshi > -Original Message- > From: Sijie Guo [mailto:si...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:12 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 On 6/20/16, 10:11 PM, "Sijie Guo" wrote: >Hello All, > >Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting >DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. > >[] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator >[] +0 Abstain. >[] -1 Do not accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Jia Zhai wrote: > +1 > > From: Sijie Guo > > Date: Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:11 PM > > Subject: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > Hello