Hi,
I would recommend that we only license that under CC-SA, but you might want
to point out that the media files are also available under LGPL3. The
downstream user can re-apply (or swap with) the LGPL3 if they want to, as
those media files are unmodified and we lay no additional claims.
Cheers
+1 binding
1. License, Disclaimer, Notice look good
2. Compiled source and all tests pass
3. Verified MD5 , SHA1 sigs of artifacts
4. RAT checks pass
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - name included incubating
> - signature and hashes g
Hi,
> In terms of the README mentioning bundled cryptogrphic code, it says that
> "Apache Pirk implements cryptographic software..." -- the Paillier class is
> one such implementation.
I don’t think anything is required just that it could be made a bit clearer.
Thanks,
Justin
--
Hi Justin,
The Paillier implementation was part of the original software grant for
Apache Pirk from the National Security Agency.
In terms of the README mentioning bundled cryptogrphic code, it says that
"Apache Pirk implements cryptographic software..." -- the Paillier class is
one such implemen
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name included incubating
- signature and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No unexpected binary files in release
- Can compile from source
I noticed you’ve dropped “apache” from the release artefact names, IMO it’s
good to keep it for brandi
Hi,
Our GSOC student wants to include a PNG for a CWL logo (for
representing CWL services within Apache Taverna), but the original
logo is dual-licensed:
>From https://github.com/common-workflow-language/logo/blob/master/LICENSE.md
> The Common Workflow Language Logos are (C) Copyright 2016 the
Hi All,
The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating release has passed after
updating the cryptographic export information; it is a source-only release
(no binary artifacts). We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the
release.
The PPMC vote thread is located here:
*https://lists.apach
Ok, I think it's time to close this vote. Wev' got 7 +1 for the retirement :
Bertrand,
Colm,
John,
Mark,
Roman,
Ted,
and me.
I'll move forward from this point.
Thanks !
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.a