On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:30 AM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> > wrote:
> >
> >> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
> >> that the only artifacts allowed t
Jake,
I"m definitely interested in hearing more. I've been off and on trying to
get ActiveMQ Artemis builds up on docker. I haven't gotten quite enough of
an answer from infra, and don't know enough myself to get it working right.
I suspect, from my own artifactory experience, the bintray exper
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> We have our own docker registry available for projects to use, its hosted
> out of bintray. Access can be granted per project via an infra ticket
> request.
>
> Dockerhub is used in an automated builds capacity, we can set it to only
> build
Hi,
It has been 72 hours and the IMPC vote for Apache Pirk 0.1.0-release has
passed with four +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. The Apache Pirk
(incubating) community will proceed with the release.
Thanks!
Ellison Anne
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> +1 binding
>
We have our own docker registry available for projects to use, its hosted
out of bintray. Access can be granted per project via an infra ticket
request.
Dockerhub is used in an automated builds capacity, we can set it to only
build tagged versions.
Happy to answer any questions about either offer
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> FWIW, I say that we should just adopt a repository.apache.org approach
> and declare that nightly/snapshot Docker images can only be distributed
> from our own Docker repo. That way there's absolutely 0 chance anybody
> can get them by ac
On Aug 29, 2016 8:30 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
> ...
> >> Note that there was a separate discussion focused on where is the right
> >> place for nightly/snapshot Docker builds to be deposited to.
> >>
> >> Sadly, that discussion bore no fruit :-(
> >>
> >
> > Was there? I would love to get
See my reply to John if you're curious to know my take on both questions.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2016 5:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>>
>> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
>> that the only artifacts
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
>> that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
>>
>> If we agree on that, I see no problem w
Sorry for a lazy question. Can you point me at the proces you have
ant/maven/shell/jenkins/whatever that builds the dockers. I would be
interested in seeing if I can apply that elsewhere.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We, Apache Guacamole (incubating), woul
10 matches
Mail list logo