Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
The thing is that a lot of the NetBeans infrastructure has built up and expanded over the 20 years of its existence. The Apache incubator is going to be a great moment in which to evaluate what we want to keep and what should be discarded and how these various pieces fit into Apache's structures.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > On 16.09.2016 00:36, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > [...] >> >> Public servers: >> - www.netbeans.org: ... >> - hg.netbeans.org: ... >> - deadlock.netbeans.org: ... >> - bits.netbeans.org: ... >> - updates.netbeans.org: ...

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
No one said we want to keep that many subdomains. We're simply listing our current infrastructure at this point. I'd say we probably need a lot less than we currently have. Gj On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > On 16.09.2016 00:36, Geertjan Wielenga

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Jochen Theodorou
On 16.09.2016 00:36, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: [...] Public servers: - www.netbeans.org: ... - hg.netbeans.org: ... - deadlock.netbeans.org: ... - bits.netbeans.org: ... - updates.netbeans.org: ... - statistics.netbeans.org: ... - plugins.netbeans.org: ... - forums.netbenas.org: ... -

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

2016-09-16 Thread Alan Gates
Forwarding my +1 from the vote on the dev list. Alan. > On Sep 15, 2016, at 22:44, Poorna Chandra wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.9.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the second release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Take note of the earlier points re parallel integration ( http://wiki.netbeans.org/HgParallelProjectIntegration), which is different to the GitHub approach, which we are happy to adopt, so a lot of the current complexities will not be applicable anymore. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Andrew

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Commit Before Review - unless the change is an API change - then we use review before integration and the review is done in bugzilla. Committers never directly push to the cannonical repo master branch. That branch is closed for integration. In Git terminology, each team (jet-main, web-main,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi Emmanuel, > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: >> ...Better have a hard core set of mentors from the beginning than having a >> bunch of people that

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Andrew Bayer
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > - deadlock.netbeans.org: 6 VMs, used mainly for propagation of changes > between team repositories and to the releases repository, including jobs > for building community plugins (releases*-au) and

Re: ASF Android release policy

2016-09-16 Thread Ian Dunlop
Hello, Thanks for all the advice. I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12614 to ask for an ASF Google play account. Cheers, Ian On 13 September 2016 at 16:01, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Ian Dunlop wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...the #1 requirement is for Apache NetBeans to be able > to produce daily/release builds and to upload them to netbeans.org or > another download area under Apache Daily releases are

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...Who from Apache infra is going to do 1:1 discovery?... I don't know but please make sure the results are documented (as long as it's nothing confidential) either on this list or as an appendix to

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > ...I really expect that the > IPMC would allow a significantly longer discuss thread on such a large, > complex, and long-historied project before voting... I have no problems waiting a bit longer before voting, as

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Mark Struberg
That goes into a direction I was about to ask anyway, the development model: Is it CTR (commit-then-review) or RTC (review-then-commit). Means do committers directly push to the cannonical repo master branch and before doing a release there is a manual stabilisation phase? Or do you only

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

2016-09-16 Thread James Taylor
Transferring my +1 from dev vote here. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.9.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the second release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra community has