Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

I'm going to switch my vote to +1 for the release. Other issues are issues outside of this podling's domain. John On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:31 AM John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 3:23 AM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > Hi, > > > So,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

> On Oct 30, 2016, at 8:04 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Craig, > > Your definition matches my definition from 3 years ago, which I had used > for a long while until someone told me I'm wrong. Are you on legal > discuss? Let's move this over there. Even better, there

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Craig, Your definition matches my definition from 3 years ago, which I had used for a long while until someone told me I'm wrong. Are you on legal discuss? Let's move this over there. On Oct 30, 2016 10:50, "Craig Russell" wrote: > On Oct 30, 2016, at 6:03 AM, John

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

> On Oct 30, 2016, at 6:03 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:53 PM Craig Russell > wrote: > >> >>> On Oct 29, 2016, at 1:54 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM

Re: Permission to edit the Incubator wiki page

Thanks John. Susan > On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Added, happy editing! > >>> Hi, >>> >>> I will be filing the November podling report for Apache Edgent. >>> >>> May I please have permission to edit this wiki page? >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:53 PM Craig Russell wrote: > > > On Oct 29, 2016, at 1:54 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM Justin Mclean > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >>> -1 due to the