Re: [CLOSED] Can we push docker images to https://hub.docker.com/u/apache/

Just saw Thejas' email ([DISCUSS] publishing docker image for podling) on this ticket. I am now closing this thread to avoid confusion. On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Wang Wei wrote: > Hi all, > > I am from the incubator-singa project. > We want to host our docker

[Docker] Can we push docker images to https://hub.docker.com/u/apache/

Hi all, I am from the incubator-singa project. We want to host our docker images under https://hub.docker.com/u/apache/. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13156 Currently, there is no incubator project hosting docker images under the Apache namespace. I start this thread to get binding

[DISCUSS] publishing docker image for podling

As per Greg Stein's comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13156, we haven't had any podling request for a docker image (aka a "convenience binary") to be published within Apache's namespace in hub.docker.com . Starting this thread to see if we should have a vote on for this or we

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-146) Test

John D. Ament created INCUBATOR-146: --- Summary: Test Key: INCUBATOR-146 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-146 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Task Reporter:

Re: Write access to January report page

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:11 PM David E Jones wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 17:13 -0800, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Niclas Hedhman > wrote: > > > Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be

Re: Write access to January report page

On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 17:13 -0800, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be > > editable by Mentors/IPMC members? > > It's editable by anyone whose wiki username

Re: [DISCUSS] Significance of Artifact Names

Huge +1 to what Cédric has said. Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Cédric Champeau wrote: > Cross-posting since I missed this topic in the first place. My apologies > for the duplicate: > > I would argue that one of the Foundation mottos is "community

Re: Write access to January report page

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > My login as "niclas" Added. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Write access to January report page

My login as "niclas" On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be > > editable by Mentors/IPMC members? > >

Re: Wiki Contributor

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > Would someone kindly add me as a contributor to the incubator wiki? > > My username is RandallLeeds. Done. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Write access to January report page

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be > editable by Mentors/IPMC members? It's editable by anyone whose wiki username we add to the ContributorsGroup page. What's your wiki id for

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

+1 binding On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ramesh Mani wrote: > Dear Incubator members, > > Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version > and with it there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger > community to consider graduation to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

+1 (binding) Chris Nauroth On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Ramesh Mani wrote: > Dear Incubator members, > > Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version > and with it there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger > community to

Write access to January report page

Hi, Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be editable by Mentors/IPMC members? Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Wiki Contributor

Would someone kindly add me as a contributor to the incubator wiki? My username is RandallLeeds. Thank you.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

+1 Thanks a lot Ramesh for your efforts in getting the TLP process nailed down. Thanks to all ranger developers/user community for your continued support and contribution to the growth of this project. Thanks, Selva- On 1/4/17, 5:48 PM, "Ramesh Mani" wrote:

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

Dear Incubator members, Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version and with it there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger community to consider graduation to TLP. Apache Ranger entered into incubation on 24th July 2014 and from this welcoming community

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Chris Nauroth On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Ramesh Mani wrote: > Dear Incubator members, > > Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version > and with it there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger > community to

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator

Cancelling this Voting thread as I had to start a new voting thread with all the members. Thanks, Ramesh From: Ramesh Mani > Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM To: "general@incubator.apache.org"

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator

Dear Incubator members, Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version and with it there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger community to consider graduation to TLP. Apache Ranger entered into incubation on 24th July 2014 and from this welcoming community

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Activity on dev looks very healthy, several releases, active contributors are from a reasonably diverse set of employers. Good luck! On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Ramesh Mani

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Ramesh Mani wrote: > Dear Incubator members, > > Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version and > with it there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger community to > consider graduation to TLP. Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Significance of Artifact Names

Cross-posting since I missed this topic in the first place. My apologies for the duplicate: I would argue that one of the Foundation mottos is "community first". In that sense, enforcing a policy like that is not thinking about users. It's adding a burden they don't care about. I am strongly

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

I'll point out that this is a cancel thread..., I'm fine if people want to continue chatting in here, but I started a new discussion on https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/15550f5bf622ae3070b558505c8a0fd0ce3b23df3012d57de8b6d9f3@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E I'll try to answer questions I

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

Late to the party, but having a long think about this is sometimes beneficial. +1 to drop the -incubator/-incubating version attachment for any artifacts (not just Maven). My reasoning is the following: Source code lives longer than any community. Long after a podling has gone through the

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

On 04.01.2017 07:28, Mark Struberg wrote: [...] I'm a bit surprised that groovy still uses the org.codehaus groupId, but I guess they have a deal with Ben (the former owner and thus (former?) copyright holder of 'Codehaus'). So while this will work for now I guess that even groovy will move to

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

Below, explains my own views on the version string (and other labels and points to mention "-incubating"), and is why I gave a +1 to John's vote. Less invasion. Re: package names. Apache Subversion introduced new org.apache packages in its new release, and left it's old org.tigris packages

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

I would argue that one of the Foundation mottos is "community first". In that sense, enforcing a policy like that is not thinking about users. It's adding a burden they don't care about. I am strongly against anything that enforces technical requirements where there shouldn't be. Enforcing Maven

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator

+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub > Am 04.01.2017 um 01:21 schrieb Ramesh Mani : > > Dear Incubator members, > > Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version and > with it there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger community to >