Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1

2017-02-09 Thread Sterling Hughes
The commits under consideration are as follows: blinky: repos: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mynewt-blinky commit a69b409197a845bc75748af564cb08c4ec7701d4 core: repos: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mynewt-core commit de35d2337189a69d97aa3fdccc4f7

[VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1

2017-02-09 Thread will sanfilippo
Hello, The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open source initiative for c

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.1.0 (RC1)

2017-02-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Changing my vote to be also -1 (binding) until the license / dependancy issue sorted, but everything else looks good. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.1.0 (RC1)

2017-02-09 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:34 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Wei, > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:19 PM Wang Wei wrote: > > John, > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:24 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Wang, > > > > First, please review [1], especially the Note section. > > > Thank you for the information. >

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.1.0 (RC1)

2017-02-09 Thread John D. Ament
Wei, On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:19 PM Wang Wei wrote: > John, > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:24 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Wang, > > > > First, please review [1], especially the Note section. > > > Thank you for the information. > > > Second, even if I were to change my vote from -1 to +1 d

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.1.0 (RC1)

2017-02-09 Thread Wang Wei
John, On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:24 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Wang, > > First, please review [1], especially the Note section. > Thank you for the information. > Second, even if I were to change my vote from -1 to +1 do you have enough > votes? Only Justin has voted +1. Or were you carrying o

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Ed Espino
Alan Gates has identified jar files in our distribution. This has caused us to CANCEL the vote and we will be resubmitting the release for consideration as soon as the issues have been resolved. FYI: I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1319 to track this issue. -=e -- *Ed Es

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Ed Espino
Thanks for your feedback Justin. Very much appreciated. I will be canceling the vote. Regards, -=e On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It would be a -1 from me if there’s jars in the source release. (I’ve not > looked yet) so IMO would be best to cancel this vote and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, It would be a -1 from me if there’s jars in the source release. (I’ve not looked yet) so IMO would be best to cancel this vote and vote on a new RC. > Looking for ways to enhance the identification of release issues as early > as possible, would you be willing to share the release review pro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Ed Espino
Alan, Per your suggestion (which I agree with), I will be pulling this release from IPMC release review consideration. We will be updating the Apache RAT pom.xml file to refine the exclusions of the "src/test" directory so this visibility of the jar files will be evident. Additionally, we will e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Alan Gates
Generally we don't want binary files in source releases, so unless there's a very strong reason to continue with the release I'd say it's better to respin it. Alan. > On Feb 9, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Ed Espino wrote: > > Alan, > > Please, no need to apologize. We appreciate your review contribu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Ed Espino
Alan, Please, no need to apologize. We appreciate your review contributions immensely. I was just getting a bit anxious as this is my initial time being a release manager for an Apache project. Does the existence of the jar files warrant another release candidate or can we fix HAWQ-1319 in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Alan Gates
I responded on the thread. Sorry, I should have seen this sooner and voted on it. Alan. > On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Ed Espino wrote: > > Good catch Alan. I agree with you that the jar files should be removed. I > have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1319 to address > thi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Ed Espino
Good catch Alan. I agree with you that the jar files should be removed. I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1319 to address this issue. Regards, -=e On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I checked the licenses, notice, disclaimer, and signatures. These all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

2017-02-09 Thread Alan Gates
I checked the licenses, notice, disclaimer, and signatures. These all look good. One question, there are a couple of jar files in a test directory, ./src/test/feature/UDF/sql/PLJavaAdd.jar and ./src/test/feature/UDF/sql/PLJavauAdd.jar In general it's a bad idea to include binary files since

[ANNOUNCE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating released.

2017-02-09 Thread Arvind Surve
The Apache SystemML team is pleased to announce the release of Apache SystemML version 0.12.0-incubating.Apache SystemML provides declarative large-scale machine learning (ML) that aims at a flexible specification of ML algorithms and automatic generation of hybrid runtime plans ranging from singl