Re: PPMC voting new committers

Hi It sounds good to me. It's a good idea. Regards JB On Nov 3, 2017, 18:34, at 18:34, Craig Russell wrote: >I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. voting new >committers. > >While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new committers, >we do have

[DISCUSS] Accept ServiceComb into Apache Incubator

Hi Folks, I would like to open a DISCUSS thread on the topic of accepting the ServiceComb Project into the Incubator. ServiceComb is a microservice framework that provides a set of tools and components to make development and deployment of cloud applications easier. The draft proposal can be

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Crail into the Apache Incubator

+1 On 11/1/17, 7:40 AM, "Craig Russell" wrote: Subject line change to close the vote. > On Nov 1, 2017, at 6:42 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Luciano Resende > wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

Thanks Ryan, Let me look into this right away. On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Ryan Blue wrote: > -1 (binding) > > There are a few things that could be improved, but my -1 is because the > release tarball doesn’t match the release tag (inclusion of > .example-image),

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

-0 I started a review and noticed that the RELEASE_NOTES.md is for 0.1.0 and the copyright year in NOTICE should be updated. I’ll stop for now. Regards, Dave > On Nov 3, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Ryan Blue wrote: > > -1 (binding) > > There are a few things that could be

PPMC voting new committers

I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. voting new committers. While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new committers, we do have best practices documented in http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html that explicitly calls for consensus approval of at least three

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

-1 (binding) There are a few things that could be improved, but my -1 is because the release tarball doesn’t match the release tag (inclusion of .example-image), some files are missing the license header, and there is no mention in the license file of mesos-protobuf that’s included in the

Re: Update README for retired podlings?

Dave Fisher wrote on 11/2/17 11:13 PM: >> On Nov 2, 2017, at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:17 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > On Nov 2, 2017, at 3:08 PM, sebb wrote: > On 2 November 2017 at 21:07, Dave