Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing

2018-11-04 Thread ???? Sheng Wu
Cool. Thanks. They are back now. Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking From Wu Sheng 's phone. -- Original -- From: Justin Mclean Date: Mon,Nov 5,2018 2:43 PM To: general Subject: Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing Hi, Not sure what the issue was but

Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing

2018-11-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Not sure what the issue was but rebuilding the site fixed it, if’s there’s still any issues please post here. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing

2018-11-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Thanks for reporting - looks like there an issue with the incubator site build at the moment. [1] Thanks, Justin 1.https://builds.apache.org/job/Incubator%20Site/663/console - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing

2018-11-04 Thread Raja Sundaram Ganesan
Actually, all the podling pages return 404. -Raja On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:43 AM 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > Hi > > > I just noticed `List of Current Podlings`[1] and SkyWalking[2](maybe other > podling projects too) pages are missing, 404 from my side. > > > [1]

List of Current Podling pages are missing

2018-11-04 Thread ???? Sheng Wu
Hi I just noticed `List of Current Podlings`[1] and SkyWalking[2](maybe other podling projects too) pages are missing, 404 from my side. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/#current [2] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/skywalking.html -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

2018-11-04 Thread Luciano Resende
If the podling decide to release only the source artifacts I would be +1 (binding) for that as Justin and Julian mentioned. On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 14:07 Julian Hyde wrote: > Forwarding my vote from the PPMC vote: +1 (binding) > > I checked the source artifacts but not the binary artifacts.

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP

2018-11-04 Thread William Guo
Hi all, With 13 +1 non-binding votes, 5 +1 binding votes and no -1 or +/-0 votes, This vote PASSES. Thanks to everyone who voted. The vote tally is attached. Non-binding: 邵亮 Jenny Li ShaoFeng Shi Eugene Liu Sheng Wu Alex Lv Yin Wan John Liu Kevin Yao Matt Sicker Xin Wang Li De He Wang

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

2018-11-04 Thread Julian Hyde
Forwarding my vote from the PPMC vote: +1 (binding) I checked the source artifacts but not the binary artifacts. Therefore I agree with Justin that the source artifacts can be included in the release but not the binary artifacts. Julian On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:04 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

2018-11-04 Thread Xin Wang
+1 no-binding Sharing-Sphere is a awesmome relational database middleware. It's great for it to be incubated in Apache community. 彭勇升 Peng Yongsheng <8082...@qq.com> 于2018年11月2日周五 下午11:59写道: > Thanks to Sharding-Sphere team. > > > My introduction: > > The company I worked for and the company I’m

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.0-incubating Candidate 5

2018-11-04 Thread Karthik Ramasamy
+1 (non binding) > > On Oct 31, 2018 at 10:31 AM, mailto:freen...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > This is the 5th release candidate for Apache Heron, version > 0.20.0-incubating. Thanks everyone for providing various feedback for the > previous release

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.0-incubating Candidate 5

2018-11-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - All source files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files I was unable to compile but probably my setup. It would be good to see some build instructions included

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

2018-11-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I’m +1 (binding) on releasing the source package, but -1 on the binary. Assuming you get enough votes you could IMO just release the source artefact. I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - DISCLAIMER exists - no unexpected binary files - can

Re: [DISCUSS] bprc proposal

2018-11-04 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > I just have a quick look at the proposal, it looks like we need to add > more third party dependencies from the source file in the > directory[1]. You can add them but IMO not required as this will be sorted out during IP clearance and release review during graduation. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] bprc proposal

2018-11-04 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi, I just have a quick look at the proposal, it looks like we need to add more third party dependencies from the source file in the directory[1]. [1]https://github.com/brpc/brpc/tree/master/src/butil/third_party Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:01 AM