+1
在 2019年1月26日星期六，Jun Liu 写道：
> +1
>
> Jun
>
> > On Jan 21, 2019, at 8:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > The following lists are all but inactive:
> >
> > announce@ Last post Jan 2008
> > android-interest@ Last post Mar 2011
> > dev@ - only general circulars
> > jaxws-tck@ (private) Last post 2012
>
+1
Jun
> On Jan 21, 2019, at 8:11 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> The following lists are all but inactive:
>
> announce@ Last post Jan 2008
> android-interest@ Last post Mar 2011
> dev@ - only general circulars
> jaxws-tck@ (private) Last post 2012
> projects@ Last post Jul 2011
> user@ - only general
+1 for Justin
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, 18:35 Justin Mclean Hi,
>
> I’ll comment on the other parts of the proposal once I’ve thought about it
> a bit, but I’m also have a decent amount of training and course creation
> experience and would like to be on the (P)PMC / initial committer list if
>
Hi,
+1 binding but there a few minor issues that need looking into
I checked:
- incubating in release name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE may have a couple of minor issue (see below)
- NOTICE good
- No unexpected binary in release
- A few minor header issues
- Can
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is OK
- Compile the source code without any error.
- NOTICE need to be fix in next release
As Dubbo 2.7.0 is ready, I think we need to do the pack named release ASAP.
Willem Jiang
Twitter:
Hi,
I’ll comment on the other parts of the proposal once I’ve thought about it a
bit, but I’m also have a decent amount of training and course creation
experience and would like to be on the (P)PMC / initial committer list if
you'll have me. Assuming you go down the IPMC I’d also happy to be
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE all correct
- NOTICE doesn’t need Netty mentioned (please fix in next release)
- No unexpected binary in releases
- All source files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Actually, incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project does not use Netty project
source and keeps the dependecies are optional.
However, I saw
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product, and
referenced the dubbo's LICENSE file, thus some declarations were added
in license, and
In the past, SVN repos have just been made read-only.
(The intention was to move them to
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/RETIRED/ but that never
happened)
I think it would be a mistake to drop the repos.
There's no guarantee that the code is available anywhere else, and it
seems wrong to
Just a note from infra that we'll need a decision from the IPMC on this
matter no later than February 7th, preferably before :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 1/13/19 10:14 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hello IPMC and other folks,
We have a big bunch of retired podlings with git repositories on
Hello everyone,
this is the result of the discussion I started in December 2018[1].
I would like to start this thread to get feedback on a proposal we've been
working on for a project focused on developing training material for Apache
& 3rd party projects.
The full proposal can be found here <
I just found in the Notice file there is a line of
"This product contains code form the Netty Project:"
I don't think incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project using the Netty
project source directly. Can you explain it?
BTW, If we use the netty source code, we need to mention it in the
License file
12 matches
Mail list logo
