Re: [VOTE] (Re)Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) 1.0.0

2019-06-22 Thread Joshua Poore
Hi General, Just a friendly reminder to Flagon Mentors and larger IPMC vote on the (Re)Release of Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) 1.0.0; we’re still short of +2 binding votes. Thanks! > On Jun 20, 2019, at 9:33 PM, Joshua Poore wrote: > > Hello, > > On Jun 17th we posted an IPMC

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

2019-06-22 Thread Dave Fisher
I find TVM concentrating on moving their community to Apache first to be very refreshing. I think that may allow an eyes wide open approach to Apache governance. I think a soft approach to policy compliance will yield better, happier Apache communities. The Incubator should celebrate the

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

2019-06-22 Thread Rich Bowen
A couple of thoughts: Podlings are not permitted to call themselves "Apache Foo" because they are not yet full Apache projects. While in the incubator we should expect podlibgs to fail at the rules. They're new to them and many of them feel arbitrary, even capricious, to those coming in from

Re: LGPL dependency

2019-06-22 Thread Matt Sicker
WebKit dates back to KHTML, an LGPL web engine from KDE. It sounds like it’s some WebKit specific files that are BSD licensed. I haven’t inspected the individual files, but I suspect that the header files are BSD licensed to make linking less of a legal headache. On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 07:11,

Re: No access to dist.apache.org

2019-06-22 Thread Luciano Resende
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 1:45 PM leerho wrote: > > 1) I asked INFRA how to setup the proper structures in dist.a.o. > INFRA tells me that IPMC members create the proper folders in dist/dev and > dist/release directories and once created the PPMC should have access. > Regarding the infrastructure

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

2019-06-22 Thread ซ่อยค่อย ลืมเขาแน่
ในวันที่ ศ. 21 มิ.ย. 2019 23:22 Alex Harui เขียนว่า: > It all makes sense to me. I think there are two key points that are > driving all of this discussion: > > "5. Disclaimers generally don't remove liability" > > IANAL so I don't know if that's true or not. For sure there are lots of >

Re: No access to dist.apache.org

2019-06-22 Thread ซ่อยค่อย ลืมเขาแน่
ในวันที่ ส. 22 มิ.ย. 2019 03:45 leerho เขียนว่า: > 1) I asked INFRA how to setup the proper structures in dist.a.o. > INFRA tells me that IPMC members create the proper folders in dist/dev and > dist/release directories and once created the PPMC should have access. > > 2) There is also no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.0 [RC2]

2019-06-22 Thread ซ่อยค่อย ลืมเขาแน่
ในวันที่ ส. 22 มิ.ย. 2019 04:21 Gian Merlino เขียนว่า: > > I'll leave that to others to decide, but if I were release manager, I > > would fix them before release. > > Thanks for taking the time to inspect our release! > > I'm not the release manager here, but my thoughts are that for issues

Re: Incubator PMC report timeline for July 2019

2019-06-22 Thread ซ่อยค่อย ลืมเขาแน่
ในวันที่ ส. 22 มิ.ย. 2019 09:44 Justin Mclean เขียนว่า: > Hi, > > Here’s the timeline for the next incubator report [1] > > Wed July 03 - Podling reports due by end of day > Sun July 07 - Shepherd reviews due by end of day > Sun July 07 - Summary due by end of day > Tue July 09 - Mentor signoff

Re: LGPL dependency

2019-06-22 Thread ซ่อยค่อย ลืมเขาแน่
ในวันที่ ศ. 21 มิ.ย. 2019 15:37 申远 เขียนว่า: > Sorry for my late reply, I have open a JIRA issue[1] for this problem. > > I'm really appreciated your help here, thank you all. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-464 > > Best Regards, > YorkShen > > 申远 > > > 申远 于2019年6月18日周二

Re: LGPL dependency

2019-06-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The Webkit license page https://webkit.org/licensing-webkit/ says portions > licensed under LGPL and BSD licenses. > > Usually this means it's the user's choice which license to use. Not quite actually it not dual licensed in the tradition l sense. It’s not licensed A or B but it’s

Re: LGPL dependency

2019-06-22 Thread Craig Russell
The Webkit license page https://webkit.org/licensing-webkit/ says portions licensed under LGPL and BSD licenses. Usually this means it's the user's choice which license to use. We would choose the BSD License for the components that we use. Can you find anywhere a statement that the Webkit.so