[VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.16.0 [RC3]

2019-09-18 Thread Clint Wylie
Hi IPMC, The Apache Druid community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.16.0 (rc3). We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Druid (incubating) is a high performance analytics data store for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-cpp (incubating) 1.0.0 [RC2]

2019-09-18 Thread leerho
Hi Justin, Thank you for your help, but we would like to be really clear on what you have in mind in terms of proper content of the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Attached are the LICENSE and NOTICE from another one of our repos, but the concept is the same as what Alex is trying to clarify: If

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-cpp (incubating) 1.0.0 [RC2]

2019-09-18 Thread Alexander Saydakov
I am talking about the attribution: link to the original, link to our file or files where it is used. Currently this attribution is in the NOTICE. It is not duplicated in the LICENSE. Do you propose to move this attribution to the LICENSE or do you believe that it is not necessary? Thanks. On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-cpp (incubating) 1.0.0 [RC2]

2019-09-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > So do you propose to move it to the LICENSE or remove altogether? That information should already be part of the LICENSE file (for instance as text of the MIT license will include the copyright line). There no need for duplication, but if it is not it should be added there. Thanks,

Re: [MENTORS] Board report submitted, a few missing mentor sign-offs

2019-09-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Related question: the incubator report says "The board has motions for > the following: Apache Rya, Apache SINGA" but I don't see the vote for > SINGA having completed or any note to the board to add a resolution. The report was written a few weeks back and at hat point it looked like the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Recommend 'Apache SINGA graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

2019-09-18 Thread Ted Dunning
Please note that this summary is a bit late for board approval this month. On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:48 PM Moaz Reyad wrote: > The vote to recommend Apache SINGA graduation to Top Level Project > resolution > to the board has passed with: > > 4 +1 votes: > > Furkan Kamaci > Kevin Ratnasekera

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-cpp (incubating) 1.0.0 [RC2]

2019-09-18 Thread Alexander Saydakov
So do you propose to move it to the LICENSE or remove altogether? On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:11 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi. > If that content was in a NOTICE from a 3rd party ALv2 bit of software you > would include it, that is the case with Ratis. That is not the case with > your project.

[RESULT][VOTE] Recommend 'Apache SINGA graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

2019-09-18 Thread Moaz Reyad
The vote to recommend Apache SINGA graduation to Top Level Project resolution to the board has passed with: 4 +1 votes: Furkan Kamaci Kevin Ratnasekera Justin Mclean Alan Gates No 0 or -1 votes. The voting thread:

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache SINGA graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

2019-09-18 Thread Moaz Reyad
The vote passed and is now closed. I will send the result email soon. Thank you all for voting! Moaz On 2019/09/13 20:38:13, Moaz Reyad wrote: > In the four and a half years that Apache SINGA (incubating) has been > a part of the Apache incubator, the community has grown, diversified, > and

Re: [MENTORS] Board report submitted, a few missing mentor sign-offs

2019-09-18 Thread Shane Curcuru
Related question: the incubator report says "The board has motions for the following: Apache Rya, Apache SINGA" but I don't see the vote for SINGA having completed or any note to the board to add a resolution. Given the late timing, I'd personally suggest adding the SINGA resolution for next