Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.5.0 (release candidate 2)

2019-11-11 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - No binary files in release - All source files have ASF headers The offical download page [1] says to use nom to install as the first option it probably shouldn’t be doi

[VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.5.0 (release candidate 2)

2019-11-11 Thread SHUANG SU
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.5.0 (release candidate 2). Apache ECharts community has voted and approved the release. Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5138fd89d1ded77cffa41cd9f3aecbdf7911fac488db422a441108a8@%3Cdev.echarts.a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.35.0 [RC3]

2019-11-11 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi, +1 from me (binding). I checked: - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - Checked PGP signatures - Checked Checksums Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:30 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I ch

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

2019-11-11 Thread Elek, Marton
The vote passes with 4 bindig +1's. Thank you very much for all of you votes. Marton (will create jiras for the two minor issues: Notice (c) upgrade + update the second NOTICE...) On 11/5/19 9:36 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: Hi, Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.3.0-rc0 vote [1] is just passed on the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.35.0 [RC3]

2019-11-11 Thread Daniel Gaspar
Dear IPMC, Thank you Alan and Justin for your votes; the minimum 72 h term is now up, and we still need one more binding +1 vote to be able to release version 0.35.0 of Apache Superset (incubating). On behalf of the community, I plead to the remaining members of the Incubator PMC to review and d

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Accepting Donation from Weex UI to Apache Weex

2019-11-11 Thread 申远
If there is no other issue, then the IP clearance passed based on lazy consensus (120 hours passed). Best Regards, YorkShen 申远 申远 于2019年11月10日周日 下午5:20写道: > I'm not 100% sure what you mean by that. Only the project has that right, >> the author (once the code is decorated) has no more or less

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

2019-11-11 Thread Dominik Riemer
Hi all, super cool! Special thanks to Chris Dutz for his great support in creating this proposal. We absolutely look forward to transitioning StreamPipes to an Apache community project. Dominik -Original Message- From: Julian Feinauer Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 9:56 AM To: general

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

2019-11-11 Thread Julian Feinauer
Congratulations to the Streampipes Team : ) Julian Am 11.11.19, 09:51 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi all, usually the initiator of the vote also closes it ... However there were several "+1" without "binding" or "non-binding" so I had to check the IPMC list in whimsy to find

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

2019-11-11 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, usually the initiator of the vote also closes it ... However there were several "+1" without "binding" or "non-binding" so I had to check the IPMC list in whimsy to find out. And the results are: +1 binding: 16 +1 non-binding: 2 0: 0 -1: 0 So the vote passes and I'll start the process