Hi,
I agree this could be clearer:
"Mentors MUST be on the IPMC. This should be checked prior to beginning
incubation. Any prospective Mentors who are not yet on the IPMC should ask to
be added (by election). Email the application to priv...@incubator.apache.org.”
How about this:
"Mentors
Hi -
The instructions here [1] are misleading.
(a) An ASF Member who is not on the IPMC may be added via “application”
(b) Non IPMC members who are not ASF Members do NOT file applications. Instead
they are nominated, secretly, by an IPMC member and voted on by the IPMC. There
is no assurance
Sharing some thoughts about this particular question. The intention of the
guideline is to clearly distinguish the Apache from non-apache ones (to
protect apache's brand).
There are a few ways to achieve so:
- W0: Change the release note to indicate the tag is non-apache
- W1: Change the release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17211596#comment-17211596
]
Henry Saputra commented on INCUBATOR-255:
-
[~johndament] - please close this Jira ticket. I am
Hi Justin,
I have a question about the guidelines.
> Any releases that exist before coming into incubation need to be clearly
described on the release page and tagged as such on
Does this mean that we need to change the tag/release name from something
like "4.1.0" to be
Congrats!
On 10 Oct 2020 Sat at 05:46 Henry Saputra wrote:
> Congrats to Apache TVM incubating community!
>
> - Henry
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 5:42 PM Ziheng Jiang wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache TVM (incubating) community is happy to announce Apache TVM
> > (incubating) version
Dear community,
I'm glad to announce the results of the vote for Apache TVM (incubating)
version v0.7.0 release. This is a major release with new features. All
users of Apache TVM (incubating) 0.6 are advised to upgrade. This release
is co-managed by Zhi Chen.
This vote passes with five +1 votes
