+1 binding.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signed key and checksum.
- the License and Notice file.
- There is no binary file in the source Kit.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:09 PM Lorin Lee wrote:
>
> Hello IPMC,
>
>
> The Apache brpc commun
H,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
- signatures and hashes correct
- All ASF files have ASF headers
- no unexpected binary files
- I didn’t try compiling from source
A spot check on LICENSE showed a couple of minor issues wth LCENSE e.g
"Copyright (C)
Thanks Justin, this guideline is very helpful.
We should also notify those projects who are not complying with the
guidelines. As a PPMC of the incubating project, I always follow
practices of TLP.
Mingshen
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:12 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Also, what's the best
Hi,
> Also, what's the best practice for this? I saw most projects only put
> a list of names/links.
Some care need to be taken in doing this from a branding perspective and ASF
policy view. In general this MUST NOT be on the home page.
From a recent email that was sent out:
WHY: the ASF is s
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
Hi all,
I saw some projects' websites put a "logo wall" with
organization/project logos in their "powered by" or "community" page
[1,2]. Do we need to have explicit consents from those organizations
before putting their logos?
Also, what's the best practice for this? I saw most projects only put
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
+1
Thanks!
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with
+1
Thanks
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with f
+1
I have done the following checks.
- DISCLAIMER is OK.
- LICENSE and NOTICE are OK.
- Code compiled successfully, despite some warnings on unused variables.
- All test cases passed.
Best,
Zhaofeng
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:57 AM Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling t
Hello Incubator Community,
Chris carei a his vote, +1 (binding)[1]
Best regards,
Bertty Contreras Rojas
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@wayang.apache.org/msg00579.html
[DISCUSS] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@wayang.apache.org/msg00572.html
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:52 PM Bertty Contre
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC8.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Wayang community vote thread:
*https://www.mail-archive.
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
Thanks for doing the research, Bertrand. That thread describes a case (from
2019) that is virtually identical to this one.
I recommend Hop does the same as that case: remove that person’s name from the
resolution, and vote them in as a PMC member after graduating. Since the effect
is the same,
Hello Sebb,
The mentioned key now also exists in the
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
Thank you,
Eya
On 2021/11/25 00:28:40 sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 22:53, Josh Innis wrote:
> >
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > This is a call for releasing Apache AGE (Incubating
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
Hi all,
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
release, with four +1 votes from IPMC members (Yuan Zhuang, Rong Fan,
Rundong Zhou,
I found that this email is merged with the previous voting thread
(with an incorrect KEYS link).
I'll fix it by sending another email with a different title to avoid
confusion. Sorry for the multiple emails. Thanks!
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 4:50 PM Mingshen Sun wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:56 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> ...Let’s just assume that it’s OK to include people with non-Apache email
> addresses in the graduation resolution...
I don't think that's the case, in previous similar cases Board members
asked for the resolutions to be modified to avoid
> On Nov 29, 2021, at 7:50 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 04:58, Julian Hyde wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to give someone an Apache id even if though are not a
>> committer or PMC member of any project? Maybe that would solve some of the
>> tooling issues.
>
> You will have
Hello Xun,
You can find the voting thread here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/d23btj9yydv7n6sn4qpw19p7kmrddosr
Thank you,
Eya
On 2021/11/27 13:29:18 Xun Liu wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> > The community vote thread can be found here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/d98jsr73jydh1grkbl4160569jyj
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 04:58, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 26, 2021, at 6:05 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 12:06, Matt Casters
> > mailto:matt.cast...@neo4j.com.invalid>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> As for Ricardo: he is indeed not a committer (yet) but an advisor to the
> >> pro
Hi All,
We are pleased to announce the release of Apache Doris 0.15.0-incubating.
Apache Doris (incubating) is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for
reporting and analysis.
The release is available at:
http://doris.apache.org/master/zh-CN/downloads/downloads.html
or
http:/
I checked:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each brpc repo.
[x] Signature and hash are correct
A small problem was found: in the CHANGES.md, the 1.0.0 modification
content was not listed.
I'm not sure whether it will affect the version release
tan zho
25 matches
Mail list logo
