Hi,
A couple of things stand out here to me:
- Your mentors need to be IPMC members.
- It would be helpful to include mentors who are not all affiliated with one
company
- It would be helpful to know what the existing PMC and the wider community
think about this reboot. It may be there’s no one
+1 to JB's comments. The project is open but the original set of folks who
actually worked on the code seem to have moved on. So there is a bit of a
struggle to keep the project code moving.
The mailing lists are also quiet, perhaps because the project is mature. So
Livy could be in a unique
+d...@livy.incubator.apache.org
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:38 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Abstract
>
> Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
> running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. With Livy, new applications
> can be built on top of Apache Spark that
Abstract
Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. With Livy, new applications
can be built on top of Apache Spark that require fine grained interaction
with many Spark contexts [1].
While this project has been well
Le ven. 14 oct. 2022 à 15:24, Christofer Dutz
a écrit :
> ...Would we still have an option to intervene, if for example one PPMC bunch
> adds people from the same company, for example?
That should be reviewed at graduation time.
A PPMC has no formal power, so cannot cause any harm to the
Hi,
> I’m a bit worried that in contrast to PMCs PPMCs are usually not quite
> familiar with how things work at Apache.
> Would we still have an option to intervene, if for example one PPMC bunch
> adds people from the same company, for example?
I have a slight concern there as well, but this
Hi,
> Out of curiosity: is there a specific motivation for the change for the
> incubator - or just to keep in line with 'regular' PMC path?
Mostly to keep it in line with what PMC’s do, it also simplifies the process.
> Also, is there a relevant thread somewhere from Board discussion, as to
Hi,
If a podling can’t get sign-off from their mentors (and this continually
happens) then they need to find and/or replace their existing mentors.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
HI,
> about Livy, I added a note few days ago regarding the current
> discussion on the mailing list.
Yes I did see that, but it would still be nice if the project did submit a
report as they have missed multiple reports in a row. What was discussed on
list about the project would be good
I have a simplified proposal nearly ready to send. Since there weren't any
requirements for it provided here it is just declaring the intent and new
members from this thread and my employer.
If there is anything else you'd like to see in it just let me know.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, 9:46 AM
+1
It sounds good to me.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:24 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> +1 for removing the 72-hour wait time to add a PPMC member.
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:45 AM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
There's no need to reestablished the podling as it's still running ;)
I think we can just update the original proposal, reshape the PPMC and
move forward.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:55 AM Brahma Reddy Battula wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> Any chance to re-establish podding or
+/-0 (binding)
I’m a bit worried that in contrast to PMCs PPMCs are usually not quite familiar
with how things work at Apache.
Would we still have an option to intervene, if for example one PPMC bunch adds
people from the same company, for example?
Chris
From: Goson zhang
Date: Friday, 14.
Hi Justin,
Any chance to re-establish podding or add some members to existing
community so that it can be active ,as we can see so many people are
interested to contribute to Livy podling?
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 10:02 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a note, poddlings do not go to the
+1 non-binding
peacewong 于2022年10月14日周五 15:05写道：
> +1(non binding) to keep the NOTICE and remove 72 hours of waiting.
>
> Best Regards!
>
>
>
> Willem Jiang 于2022年10月14日周五 14:24写道：
>
> > +1 for removing the 72-hour wait time to add a PPMC member.
> >
> > Willem Jiang
> >
> > Twitter:
+1(non binding) to keep the NOTICE and remove 72 hours of waiting.
Best Regards!
Willem Jiang 于2022年10月14日周五 14:24写道：
> +1 for removing the 72-hour wait time to add a PPMC member.
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:45 AM Justin Mclean
+1 for removing the 72-hour wait time to add a PPMC member.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:45 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The board recently changed the 72-hour waiting time to add a PMC member to a
> top level project. We have the same
Maybe we can prepare the report a little earlier if there is a big
event during the sign-off day.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:50 AM Calvin Kirs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Marvin-AI and Milagro have both had tutors miss sign-off,
> and other podlings have
+1(non binding) to keep the NOTICE and remove 72 hours of waiting.
Best wishes,
Charles Zhang
from Apache InLong
alin.jerpe...@sony.com 于2022年10月14日周五 12:08写道：
> +1 non-binding
>
> Best Regards
> Alin Jerpelea
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cas...@apache.org
> Sent: den 14 oktober
19 matches
Mail list logo
