Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

Hi, -1 (binding) to graduation, the PMC needs to understand the importance of and follow our randing policy; something seems to have been missed here. > About the https://opendal.apache.org/docs/python/opendal.html, it is > already on the apache.org site. It is obvious that it belongs to the >

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

About the https://opendal.apache.org/docs/python/opendal.html, it is already on the apache.org site. It is obvious that it belongs to the ASF. About other distribution platforms, using short names, rather than apache or asf prefixes is a common practice. Keeping the readme clear and stating it is

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

HI, >> 2. https://opendal.apache.org/docs/python/opendal.html This is not fixed. I suggest the PMC members have a good read of our branding policy to understand what is needed here. [1] At a minimum, the project needs to be referred to as “Apache OpenDAL”, and the trademark attribution needs t

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

Hi, As listed in that document, a GPL license with a classpath exception is category X, so everything that applies to other category X licenses applies to that license. System dependencies that users or developers typically have installed that don't impact the license of the compiled package ar

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

To better inform our users about our branding policy, particularly regarding the use of names, we've included a branding section in our README: https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3831 On Wed, Dec 27, 2023, at 14:39, Xuanwo wrote: >> I found a few minor issues where some name and br

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celeborn(Incubating) 0.3.2-incubating-rc1

Hi, Sorry, but it is -1 (binding) for now. Clearing up some of the issues below may mean that I change my vote. I checked - incubating in artifact name - signatures and hashes are correct - LICENSE mentions 1 3rd party file from Guava; however, the NOTICE lists both Apache Spark and Apache Flin

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

Justin>GPL files with classpath exceptions are not allowed [1] Justin, could you please elaborate? The link in [1] you mention reads "Special exceptions to the GNU GPL (e.g. GNU Classpath)" If "GPL with classpath exception" is not allowed, then **all** ASF Java-based projects violate the policy a

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

> I found a few minor issues where some name and branding work needs to > be done. Note that the project should be referred to as “OpenDAL” in > the first instances and generally in headings, and 3rd parties need to > make it clear it is an Apache project and includes the trademark > attribute.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) 1.2.0 rc1

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked all source releases. - incubating in names - all release include LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER - The NOTICE file for huge graph-computer could be improved, as it contains unnecessary information. "Copyright 2012 and onwards JanusGraph Authors” is clearly not correc

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

Thanks for your feedback! I interpret the response as we don't distribute JMH files in source or binary form, and it's optionally included in test scope. So we can depend on its classes like we depend on "java.lang.String". Again, no GPL files are distributed with Fury in source or binary form.

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

OK, that's really interesting. I hope you will add "Gluten-Trino " and "Gluten-Flink" as sub-projects(plugin module) under the main Gluten project and follow a single release cycle? Is it technically/architecturally feasible to develop a "Gluten-Hive"

Re: sub

Hi, please send to general-subscr...@incubator.apache.org for subscribing. On Wed, Dec 27, 2023, at 13:20, Jacky Yang wrote: > sub -- Xuanwo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional comm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) 1.2.0 rc1

Hi, Only the release artifacts need incubating in their name. Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

Hi, GPL files with classpath exceptions are not allowed [1]. Any files with that license cannot be in an ASF distribution [2] in source or binary form. They cannot be a non-optional dependency. [3] Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x 2. https://www.apa

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

I am currently looking into gluten as well and have been looking ap spark acceleration in general. Available for contribution as well as mentoring. Thanks Venkat On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 9:53 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like a good proposal. Only one thing stood out to me, while no

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

Hi, Looks like a good proposal. Only one thing stood out to me, while not impossible, planning to graduate in a year might not be easily achievable. Kind Regards, Justn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apa

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

Most JMH source files (e.g. see [1]) have the same license as java.lang.String. Do you exclude files that use `java.lang.String` from the release? I doubt so. The same goes for the benchmarks. >Or, we can exclude the benchmark code from the release like [4] but >still hold it in the VCS. There's

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

This is definitely an interesting project and I noticed this project from a very early stage. I saw many discussions above on if Gluten should be a subproject of Spark or not, and I can see the value to keep it independent just like Shaofeng's previous points. However, the project name or slogan -

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

Hi, Another instance [1] Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://github.com/zwpaper/dilu

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

Hi, Sorry, that should be "trademark attribution”, not “trademark attribute”. Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

Hi, I found a few minor issues where some name and branding work needs to be done. Note that the project should be referred to as “OpenDAL” in the first instances and generally in headings, and 3rd parties need to make it clear it is an Apache project and includes the trademark attribute. For

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Answer(Incubating) v1.2.1-RC1 (Round2)

Hi, +1 (binding) In the source release, I checked: - incubating in artifacts name - signatures and hashes are correct - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - all files have ASF headers - no unexpected binary files - my system isn't setup to compile it In the REDME.md it suggests that

sub

sub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Answer(Incubating) v1.2.1-RC1 (Round2)

Hi, +1 (binding) In the source release, I checked: - incubating in artifacts name - signatures and hashes are correct - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - all files have ASF headers - no unexpected binary files - my system isn't setup to compile it In the REDME.md it suggests that

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

+1 I am delighted to see the proposal for Gluten and honored to be a mentor for this innovative project. I look forward to contributing my insights and helping guide Gluten through the incubation process. Thank you for this opportunity, and I am ready to support the project’s success. Best rega

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

I think once it stays in the test scope, it should be good. The release policy is about compiling sources to get the binary, which means the final version could work without GPLx is the most important part. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 tison 于2023年12月27日周三 09:09写道： > > Hi, > > The new podlin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

My +1 binding Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 tison 于2023年12月25日周一 14:20写道： > > Carry my +1 from the dev maliing list. > > OpenDAL developed a diverse and vibrant community to release > high-quality OSS software during the past months and I believe its > maturity is at the level of a TLP. > > G

[LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

Hi, The new podling Fury depends on jmh[1] which is licensed under GPLv2 with "CLASSPATH" EXCEPTION. IIRC Flink ever factored out its benchmark code into a separate repo [2] to comply with ASF's license policy [3]. But since Fury doesn't modify jmh's code, just refers to some "org.openjdk.jmh."

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) 1.2.0 rc1

Hi Yu, "Do release files have the word incubating in their name?" is for the release kits, not the maven artifacts. I think we can polish the checklist for it. The examples that you showed are all the maven artifacts version, which is not required for the incubator release kit check. Just my 2 ce

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

Hi Rakesh, Thanks for your comment. The Trino plugin is under PoC, not ready for widely use at this moment, so it is staged in another git repository: https://github.com/oap-project/Gluten-Trino Flink support is still in early discussion stage, need more collaboration in the future. Best regards,

Re: [VOTE] Accept XTable into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Thanks, JP Jesus Camacho Rodriguez 于2023年12月15日周五 20:17写道： > Hi All, > > Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting > this official vote for the XTable project. > > Here is the proposal - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/XTable