Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

2024-04-16 Thread Sheng Wu
This is not to get the conclusion, and it is not clear, and many other project repositories are with this prefix. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transferring.html#first_steps_outside_the_incubator (tison found) Graduation doc is there indicating incaubtor- prefix is expected. This is just a

Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

2024-04-16 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Both of these projects are new and just getting set up. I'd give them a little time to do that. Infra in recent years have asked to minimise work for them on graduation. We recently dropped the requirement for having incubating in podling domain names so I don't see it's needed in repo names

Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

2024-04-16 Thread Willem Jiang
With the "incubator" profix, it's easy for us to tell if the project belongs to the incubator and it is still in the incubating process. Currently I cannot find any disclaimer document[1] in the repo root directory from [2][3] to tell if they are still in the incubator or not.

Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

2024-04-16 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:06 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software > Foundation. > > I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for > removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. > > Unless there are compelling

Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

2024-04-16 Thread Calvin Kirs
Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software Foundation. I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. Unless there are compelling reasons to remove the "incubator" prefix, I believe it's important

Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

2024-04-16 Thread Sheng Wu
Same mistake for Armoro as Hertzbeat team was misguided from https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 This is not discussed AFAIK, and the description is not correct. GitHub supported renaming and repository path forward automatically years ago. apache/incubator-foo -> apache/foo is

Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

2024-04-16 Thread Xuanwo
> For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change made is the removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access `polding.apache.org` instead of

Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

2024-04-16 Thread rat O
First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully entering the Apache Incubator. I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown license and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also address other unknown licenses, if they exist. I wonder if the situation

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache HoraeDB(incubating) v2.0.0-RC6 - Incubator Vote Round 2

2024-04-16 Thread tison
Cool. I encourage the RM to drop a vote on his/her release and the voter on dev@ to convey their vote on general@ also. Best, tison. 任春韶 于2024年4月16日周二 16:06写道: > The vote passes with 5 +1s and no negative votes. There were 4 binding +1s. > > Vote Thread: >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache HoraeDB(incubating) v2.0.0-RC6 - Incubator Vote Round 2

2024-04-16 Thread 任春韶
The vote passes with 5 +1s and no negative votes. There were 4 binding +1s. Vote Thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/dmc4x441jxjqkbzzxqo1j6tzpy72jcrz Votes: ShaoFeng Shi (binding) Xuanwo (binding) suyan Li Gang (binding) tison (binding) Thanks to everyone who participated in the development