PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually Daniel K's vote is binding, but that doesn't change the outcome.
Congratulations!
Paul
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Alex Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The vote to approve the graduation of Buildr as a top-level project has
now
ended with 13 +1 votes (incl
-binding:
* Niklas Gustavsson
* Erik Hatcher
* Daniel Kulp
* Luciano Resende
* Carl Trieloff
Thank you for your participation and congratulations to the Buildr project
for this important milestone!
alex
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Alex Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Buildr
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upon thinking about it, and talking with others, I really believe
that Stonehenge had the potential of being an extremely cool
effort. Not only for the code aspects, but even more importantly
the impact it could have in
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Alex Boisvert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Victor Hugo Borja ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Antoine Contal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Matthieu Riou ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Alex Boisvert be
and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President
Dear incubator overseers,
The Buildr project has been working on a draft board resolution to graduate
from the incubator. We've recently held a
votehttp://n2.nabble.com/-VOTE--Graduation-Board-Resolution-td1347057.htmlto
gauge the support of the community and feedback was all positive. The
PROTECTED])
* Alex Boisvert ( [EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Cory Harper([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Davanum Srinivas ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Guillaume Nodet( [EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Lance Waterman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Maciej Szefler ( [EMAIL
I agree, we'll need to set both codebases in the repository so we can
start the merge process.
In parallel, we also need to determine what we want from the resulting
merge so we can work together in building the new engine.
alex
James Strachan wrote:
On 16 Feb 2006, at 16:41, Ismael Ghalimi
This raises an interesting point. Is the goal of the project to produce
a BPEL engine? If so, then we could have separation between BPEL
(processes) and workflow (human tasks). I think this would help
modularity and clarify project focus.
In order words, workflow-related pieces could go
Alright, then I would revise my proposition to:
Apache Ode = Merge of PXE, Sybase BPE and Agila BPEL
Apache Agila = Merge of Agila workflow and Intalio BPEL4People
What do people think about this grouping?
alex
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 16, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
