Re: possible interest in forming a community fork of akka

a license, it looks like we > cannot backport the BSL codes to the Apache License branch. > >> If there is a newer version of the software under BSL, can I backport any of >> the code to an older, Open Source, version of Akka? > >> No. In this circumstance, you would

Chunjun Proposal

Dear Apache Incubator Community, We propose to contribute Chunjun as an Apache Incubator project. We are still looking for possible Champion and Mentors if anyone would like to volunteer. Thanks a lot. Best Regards, Real-time computing engine team of DTStack. #Chunjun Proposal ##Abstract

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

+1, I saw we have had several discussion threads and they have had several chances without positive outcome. > On Feb 16, 2022, at 07:20, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress > as an Apache podling. There is

Re: [IMPORTANT] Linkis, Doris, Shenyu, MXNet. Website branding issue

er wall" or "user cases" to a submenu like "Powered > by". > > > > > [1] https://kafka.apache.org/powered-by > > -- > > 此致！Best Regards > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > Email: > chenmin...@apache.org > > > > > > A

[IMPORTANT] Linkis, Doris, Shenyu, MXNet. Website branding issue

itHub @kezhenxu94 Apache Incubator PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc8 (corrected vote)

Carry my +1 (binding) from dev@ list — Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭) GitHub @kezhenxu94 > On Dec 6, 2021, at 12:05, Serge Panev wrote: > > Dear community, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release > candidate 8. > > Apache MXNet (incubat

Re: [VOTE] Accept SeaTunnel into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding to bring SeaTunnel into the incubator > On Dec 3, 2021, at 21:56, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on SeaTunnel [1] I would like to call a > VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your v

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

Oh yes, the problem is that `3rdparty/ctc_include` should be listed under `BSD-3` section instead of `Apache-2.0` section in the `./LICENSE` file. > On Sep 13, 2021, at 20:28, Xun Liu wrote: > > hi, zhenxu > > It is stated in the `./LICENSE`[1] file that 3rdparty/ctc_include i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

> I checked the mxnet project again, > and I found that all the files in the third-party submodule > ./3rdparty/ctc_include did not include ASF headers. Hi Xun, those files are from third-party, and is listed in LICENSE — Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭) GitHub @kezhenxu94

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kyuubi(Incubating) v1.3.0-incubating RC7

/Users/chengpan/Projects/apache-kyuubi/work/release/kyuubi-1.3.0-incubating-bin.tgz` 2. tar balls are signed by correctly. 3. “incubating” is in file names but “apache-“ is not, prefer to use apache-kyuubi-1.3.0-incubating-bin.tgz. 4. “Incubating” is not in NOTICE file. 5. Source files have license

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

ello IPMC, > > > > The Apache brpc community has voted and approved the release of Apache > > brpc (Incubating) 1.0.0-rc02. We now kindly request the IPMC members > > review and vote for this release. > > > > brpc is an industrial-grade RPC framework with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

Carry my +1 from dev@ > On Aug 30, 2021, at 07:10, Serge Panev wrote: > > Dear community, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release > candidate 7. > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. &

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.0

. - it’s better to put “Apache" and "(incubating)" in the README.md at least for the first time DataLab occurs, ex. Apache DataLab (Incubating). - there is a hidden binary file in the source tar "doc/.DS_Store”, consider removing it in the next release. > On Aug 3, 2021, at 15:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ShenYu (incubating) 2.4.0

Hi, -1 (binding) 1. the commit ID claimed in this thread doesn’t match the release tag v2.4.0 (https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/commit/dc841a2720ea0b5a6ca71f1b9c1aa7958d241f16). > Release Commit ID: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc3

. - LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP are correct. - “Incubator” is in src tar name and docs. - > On Jun 11, 2021, at 11:39, Serge Panev wrote: > > Dear community, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release > candidate 3. > > Apache MXNe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc06

; Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc06 release. > > Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting > and analysis. > > The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release: > htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.5

ote: > > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) > version 0.7.5. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language > interface to any application. > > The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release

Re: [VOTE] Retirement of Weex

start a LAZY consensus vote in the IPMC. > > [ ] +1 Support to retire Weex from Apache Incubator > [ ] -1 Do not Support to retire Weex from Apache Incubator (please > provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [1]https://inc

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Shenyu

embers want to give the following suggestions to the Shenyu's > team > - The incubating evaluation process only runs some checks on project > branding, IP clearance, and community-related issues. > - There is no endorsement of the project's technology from Apache or the > mentor side eve

Re: Release Helm chart as a derived downstream software artifact

Hi > I would like the first release of this package to be an official Apache > release. I am therefore of the mindset that it should be treated as any other > official Apache source code release. Right, it should follow the Apache release policy and release source tar to be an offici

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Shenyu

t; > > > Best, > > Jincheng > > > > > > Juan Pan 于2021年4月12日周一 下午7:55写道： > > > > > Welcome, looks many people are interested in this project. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04

tanding, 0.14.0 has not been released. Why does 0.14.7 exist? >> >> [1] https://www.modb.pro/db/49638 >> [2] https://doris.apache.org/master/en/downloads/downloads.html >> >> Thanks, >> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair >> Twitter: _WenMing >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04

p If that’s the case, the license header in file be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp is not complete, please check and compare with other files, add the missing lines into it. > I will fix the wrong path of > "fe/fe-common/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04

n/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit”, but was listed as "fe/fe-common/src/test/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit” in LICENSE.txt The missing 3rd-party files in LICENSE.txt is not a blocker IMO because there are files from the same owner ("be/src/olap/lru_cache.h”, “be/sr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70-rc1

, but I found the headers in these files are not the one ASF specified. Note that there is dedicated license header for ASF projects, see this link [1] - plugins/databases/clickhouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/databases/clickhouse/ClickhouseDatabaseMeta.java - plugins/databases/clickhouse/src

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03

021, at 12:36, 寒江雪 wrote: > > Hi all, > > Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03 release. > > Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting > and analysis. > > The Apache Doris community has voted on and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

in the LICENSE file. [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/blob/release-0.7.0-rc/LICENSE > On Mar 23, 2021, at 00:25, Yupeng Fu wrote: > > Felix and others, > > The git hash on the git tag is now the same as the one sent out in the > vote. Please check again > http

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it didn’t get the approvals from IPMC but was released actually (in both dist.a.o and GitHub). — Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭) GitHub @kezhenxu94 > On Mar 17, 2021, at 06:14, Yupeng Fu wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02

te: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Sorry for my -1 (non-binding) >>>> Same as Kris Calvin. >>>> Just my curiosity, DISCLAIMER-WIP existed in incubator-doris-0.12.0 but >>> disappears from this candidate one? >>>> >>>> &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

in this thread. [1] - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-0.7.0-rc1/ - https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/tree/release-0.7.0-rc1 - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepinot-1023 - https://repository.apache.org/content

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02

-1 (non-binding) because I cannot see a DISCLAIMER file in the release tar, neither in the GitHub repository. > On Mar 15, 2021, at 10:56, 寒江雪 wrote: > > Hi all, > > Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02 release. > > Apache Doris is an MPP-based

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING

Hi, there is a dedicated license header for ASF projects [1], while I saw you are still using a common license header [2]. Also, I cannot verify the checksum via `shasum -a 512 -c apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz.sha512`, error message is `shasum: apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ratis as TLP Project

+1 non-binding. Good luck! — Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭) GitHub @kezhenxu94 > On Jan 30, 2021, at 04:32, Uma gangumalla wrote: > > Dear Incubator Community, > > We have discussed Apache Ratis Podling graduation in the incubator general > DISCUSS thread[1] and We did not

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts as TLP (round 2)

cussion under general mailing list [6], we believe > ECharts is ready for graduation to a TLP, and we'd like to call on the vote > to > graduate Apache ECharts as TPL. > > This is a formal voting thread about Apache ECharts's graduation, please > Vote: > [ ] +1 - Recommend grad

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.13.0-incubating-rc03

: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 14:29 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.13.0-incubating-rc03 The vote on Apache Doris (incubating) version 0.13 has been opened. Looking forward your votes ^0^ Ling Miao 陈明雨 于2020年10月16日周五 下午9:03写道： > +1 (non-bind

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP

gt; > > >Twitter: willemjiang > >Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > >On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:31 PM William Guo wrote: > >> > >> +dev > >> > >> -- Forwarded message - > >> From: William Guo > >> Date: Thu, Nov 1, 201

Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

roposed resolution can be found at the bottom of this email. > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 recommend to the Board the resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker > to a TLP > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 don't graduate Apache FreeMarker to a TLP (please specify a reason) &g

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

-1 Ralph > On Jan 2, 2017, at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1] > indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in > the version string of maven artifacts. Its

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

+1 (non-binding) On September 23, 2016 at 12:51:30 PM, Suneel Marthi (smar...@apache.org) wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

On September 22, 2016 at 5:05:39 PM, Ate Douma (a...@douma.nu) wrote: On 2016-09-21 18:28, apache wrote: > I remain committed to building and sharing open-source software for social > web > data interoperability. Participating in the incubator process has taught me a > > l

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

I remain committed to building and sharing open-source software for social web data interoperability.  Participating in the incubator process has taught me a lot, and I would like the keep the project operating at Apache, but as Ate points out the community around this podling has never been

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Johnzon 0.1-incubating released

The Apache Johnzon team is happy to announce the first release of Apache Johnzon - version 0.1-incubating. Apache Johnzon is an implementation of JSR-353 (JavaTM API for JSON Processing) and provides additionally a set of useful extension for this specification like an object mapper and some JAX

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Flex 4.8.0-incubating Released

The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex 4.8.0-incubating! Apache Flex is an application framework for easily building Flash Platform-based applications for mobile devices, the browser and desktop. This is the first release under the Incubator of the Apache

London Java Community Unconference

I just wanted to let you know about a ConCom approved event in London, UK this month. There will be an Apache Way talk and a few ASF projects will be there. Maybe your projects should be too? As you may already have seen the London Java Community (LJC) are running their June Unconference

Re: [commons-ssl] - incubator / been a long time

nanoTime, like this one? http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/System.html#nanoTime() is there a difference? Filip Julius Davies wrote: Hi, Commons Developers, Incubator, I've been too busy over the last year to spend much time on incubating not-yet-commons-ssl, but I just

Re: [DISCUSS] Re-election of podling committers before graduation

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Feb 3, 2008 7:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the extent it's appropriate, should happen before they start the actual graduation process? The question is how, and it's something

Re: [DISCUSS] Re-election of podling committers before graduation

. The goal is to ensure that all Apache committers have gone through the meritocracy filter, which does not apply to people included in a podling's initial committers list, for obvious reasons. The suggested process is to have podling committers (and mentors if they want) self-nominate themselves

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Erik Bengtson for Imperius committer

My vote, fhanik For information, I'm blind copying incubator private alias. [X] +1 offer Erik commit privileges in Imperius [ ] -1 don't (why?) Here's my enthusiastic +1 Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Proposal Draft]BlueSky-Wish to ADD

to share our work with people who is interested in it around the world. We want new volunteers to make our team more diverse, active and creative. I'm sure we'll be fine with respect to communications ;) For this is our first candidate project to Apache Foundation. We are grateful

Re: Incubator Proposal: SPL

can add that to the proposal. And, of course, the code is (suppose to be) modular, so others could at it at any time. Lot more people deploy and manage large number of Tomcat instances than Geronimo instances. just ping me fhanik at apache dot org when you wish to do Tomcat integration, I

Re: Incubator Proposal: SPL

Noel J. Bergman wrote: We proposed to develop a policy-based management infrastructure that automates administrative tasks by executing policies Sounds good. I will be curious to see the reaction from the HTTP Server folks, but this sort of thing is very much needed in real-world

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 17:36 -0400, Jim Hurley wrote: I'm not going to try and pull a Bill Clinton with it depends what the definition of is is but I'd answer that I believe the Jini Community views the project as *the* Jini implementation. But *the* as in:

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

Bob Scheifler wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: We have a tradition, for good reason, for not giving our projects technology domain ownership for implementations. I'd never support Apache EMail or Apache Web. It would help me if you could explain how these existing TLP names

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Craig.Russell wrote: It would appear then that the Apache Jini podling would be the [spec project], and the to be named podling the [implementation project]. Fortunately, the incubator should be warmed up for a naming discussion. Apache JINI and Apache JINN