+1 (non-binding)
On 30 November 2010 06:52, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied
Hi,
I've been following gene...@incubator for a while and have a question.
When there's a vote on ip-clearance why would one vote against it?
Presumably one would only vote against it if someone knows some reason why
the codebase cannot be accept for legal reasons, and not for any technical
Apologies if this is not the place to discuss this, but I notice on the
Bushel Google Code page that it only honours require-bundle, is that still
the case?
Are there plans to support import/export package soon (since package level
dependencies are the recommended practice and, IMHO,
Is it still the case that Dave Kale is still the only non JPL committer
(other than mentors)?
Cheers,
Chris
On 11 November 2010 15:18, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,
The OODT community has been
All the mirror pages for me except for the last FTP one worked for me. In
the case of the last one the whole domain times-out.
Clicking on a random link on each page didn't yield any 404s for me.
Maybe you have a problem your end, or with a proxy or something?
Cheers,
Chris
On 10 November
+1 :)
Cheers,
Chris
On 9 November 2010 15:13, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
About a half dozen or so of us met up at ApacheCon after the lightning
talks
to talk briefly about Android @ the ASF.
The proposal is to create an android-inter...@i.a.o (we also thought about
@labs,
I dare say I would probably be interested in most anything you can come up
with :) but I suspect the project would need to be something more specific
as a starter for the incubator?
Could throw out a few ideas maybe, see what people can come up with? Is
this mailing list the right place for that
Sorry for shaking things up, but it sounds like you got the gist of things.
Using OSGi services to wire up Chatterbot makes it much more flexible in
the long run allowing developers/users to plug in alternative
implementations of things if they want to. I'm quite happy to join your
project as a
Hi,
I have read through the proposal and I like the idea of it.
The only issues I have are around modularity and shell/console. Apache
already has a modularity solution (Felix) based on an open standard (OSGi) I
don't think the Java community as a whole needs yet another modularity
solution. =)
I can understand why Subversion should be made a top level project quickly,
but I personally believe the namespace change is a reasonable request in
order to graduate for all the same reasons that convinced me Pivot should
change its namespace.
It sends the wrong message not to change given the
10 matches
Mail list logo
