I've looked at the last several incubation proposals and none of them
include the initial PPMC.
This might have been voted but it's not currently practice nor Policy.
Craig
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
That would be a task they have to undertake, not a right, although
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I just read the Policy again, and it sure appears that acceptance of
a podling by the Incubator is a lazy approval process. No vote occurs
unless an incubator PMC member says hold.
Read it again:
Upon a successful result, the PMC Chair of
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
My apologies if I'm resurrecting something that was discussed
extensively.
Well, yes, there have been three threads on this subject in the past
month, having about 50 emails on the subject.
Please see the incubator-general archives with
+1
Craig
On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
$subject says it all.
Here is my +1
--
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oxygenating the Web Service Platform, www.wso2.com
Hi Thilo,
On Jun 6, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It's that time again. :-) Please start preparing and submitting
your board
reports.
--- Noel
I was looking at the reporting schedule to see if UIMA needs to
report (we don't),
and saw that recent
On Jun 4, 2007, at 5:06 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
On 6/4/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
none of the guides are policy - just stuff that people think might
be helpful
I'd suggest that Community Building Guide is not only helpful to
podlings, but to any of our Projects at
that the PPMC gets the
Apache Way.
Craig
On May 30, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Having seen this identical discussion at least half a dozen times,
I've committed changes to the guides/ppmc document removing the
distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers.
The new text
+1
Craig
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:15:54 +0800, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
'retired' status.
Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project.
Hi Niclas,
On Jun 4, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 07:48, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Niclas,
There is one issue that still bothers me about your proposed ways of
voting. At some point, the nominee has to be asked, and accept, to
become a committer. This would
On Jun 3, 2007, at 9:38 PM, Craig Russell (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Craig Russell updated INCUBATOR-57:
---
Attachment: smime.p7s
Hi Martijn,
I noticed this community building stuff in the graduation guide and
thought that it was probably misplaced. I like the idea of a
community building guide all by itself.
Craig
On Jun 2, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I'm working on the graduation guide, and noticed
this issue
earlier.
I'll take another stab at updating the ppmc guidance.
Thanks,
Craig
On May 31, 2007, at 1:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Bill,
On May 30, 2007, at 11:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
o The podling's developer
I'd like to discuss one detail of the process for new committers.
On May 30, 2007, at 10:56 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
If the nominee is already an Apache committer on another project,
the proposer asks the incubator PMC chair to update the
authorization file to include the nominee
Hi Bill,
On May 30, 2007, at 11:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
o The podling's developer list, with notice posted to the Incubator
general list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the vote
email
with a cover statement that this vote is underway
Hi Martin,
On May 30, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
[...]
So IMHO, best practice for podlings is to hold a [DISCUSS] Joe
Bleau for committer on the PPMC private list, followed by a [VOTE]
on the PPMC private list, and then a formal [VOTE] on the private
Having seen this identical discussion at least half a dozen times,
I've committed changes to the guides/ppmc document removing the
distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers.
The new text says
Only votes cast by Incubator PMC members are binding. If the vote is
positive, and
that the PPMC gets the Apache Way.
Craig
On May 30, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Having seen this identical discussion at least half a dozen times,
I've committed changes to the guides/ppmc document removing the
distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers.
The new
the second option. thanks for bringing this up.
thanks,
dims
On 5/30/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to open the discussion on the best practice referred to by
the guides/ppmc because I'm not convinced that best practice for a
TLP is best practice for the incubator.
The reason
to be able
to make the request to root, but I'd have to leave it up to
infrastructure to decide if they can handle it.
Craig
Carl.
Craig L Russell wrote:
Having seen this identical discussion at least half a dozen times,
I've committed changes to the guides/ppmc document removing
Hi Yoav,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 5/30/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a
new committer on a podling, including references to the PPMC
discussion and vote, I would be inclined to vote
On May 30, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig Russell wrote:
I'd like to open the discussion on the best practice referred to by
the guides/ppmc because I'm not convinced that best practice for a
TLP is best practice for the incubator.
Personally, if I saw a vote on the
Hi Jean,
On May 30, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Carl,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
from different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and
who can
, at 3:37 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Jean,
On May 30, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Carl,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing
views
from different
Nice graphics, tying in several of the key items and time lines. I
like it.
Craig
On May 28, 2007, at 6:52 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I've created a schedule for graduation:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dashorst/517816086/
Is this accurate, and can it be used in the graduation guide?
Hi Martijn,
Having read all the posts on this proposal, I have to say I like the
idea of documenting a few things:
1. Having a pro-forma email message that prospective PMC chairs can
edit, just to make sure all the information is in them;
2. Suggesting that the prospective PMC chair keep
On May 24, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
[X ] +1 Recommend to the board to establish Apache Wicket
[ ] -1 Do not recommend establishing Apache Wicket because...
Craig Russell
DB PMC, OpenJPA PMC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://db.apache.org/jdo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On May 22, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
I've updated this proposal to explicitly include the possibility of
a single Mentor. Since this change affects Policy, another vote is
needed.
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote
, Craig L Russell wrote:
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the
Sponsor and the Incubator PMC. All Mentors must be members of the
Incubator PMC. A Mentor has
it can easily be changed
after the current proposal is implemented.
Craig
-Ted.
On 5/21/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status
Hi Bill,
On May 20, 2007, at 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Please review the changes in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept
Just an FYI - I haven't followed the jira flow terribly well,
mostly because
it takes an order
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the
Sponsor and the Incubator PMC. All Mentors must be members of the
Incubator PMC. A Mentor has responsibilities toward the Incubator
L Russell wrote:
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the
Sponsor and the Incubator PMC. All Mentors must be members of the
Incubator PMC. A Mentor has responsibilities toward
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them. Since this is Incubator Policy,
an affirmative vote is needed before changing. The JIRA issue
has .html files to review in addition to the patch.
[ ] +1 Accept the changes
[ ] -1 Don't
Hi Martijn,
On May 20, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
In the doc's for voting in a new PPMC member [1] it is stated that a
message with the vote results should be sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list. Should the PPMC private list be on the CC list? If so, shall I
provide a patch to
Hi Martijn,
On May 20, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Congratulations indeed.
Please make notes as you move OpenJPA to its new home. I feel a
guides/postgraduation.xml coming up :)
Good idea.
Craig
Martijn
On 5/19/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Congratulations to everyone involved in the OpenJPA project.
OpenJPA is now an official Apache Top Level Project. The board
approved the resolution that we voted on last week.
There is a lot of administrivia to be done, and all this will be done
over the course of the next several weeks.
Hi Brett,
+1 to most of what Leo says.
I'd point out that the main purpose of the PPMC is to get the podling
to the point of making decisions the Apache Way and the IPMC then
ratifies the decisions. This model should allow the decisions to be
made by the people who know and care the most,
PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think
On 5/14/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm confused. Could someone put some alias names to these
concepts? I thought we were talking about project-dev and
project-
user. What aliases are others referring to?
Thanks,
Craig
On May 14
Hi Yoav,
I see your point. I'll try to incorporate the sentiment in the update.
Thanks,
Craig
On May 14, 2007, at 4:39 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 5/14/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The community mailing list is open to all Apache committers. This is
the right list
] wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 5/14/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The community mailing list is open to all Apache committers.
This is
the right list for
questions about community and on community building. Subscriptions
should be from an Apache email address.
In my
Looks good to me now.
Craig
On May 13, 2007, at 4:03 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 5/12/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that the update of status of log4php wasn't done
correctly. The site-publish/projects/log4php.html was updated instead
of site-author/projects
This section of the guides/graduation document has me a little puzzled:
The community mailing list is open to all Apache committers. This is
the right list for
questions about community and on community building. Subscriptions
should be from an Apache email address.
In my experience, the
I have a slightly different view of this.
The phrase I survived the Incubator and all I got was this lousy T-
shirt seem incongruous, and combining them doesn't quite work. I
survived... stands alone.
And I agree with Noel that the survival meme isn't quite the self-
deprecating message
The incubator vote passed. I will send a message to the board to
consider the recommendation at the next board meeting.
The following votes were recorded +1 in favor of recommending to the
board that OpenJPA be graduated to a Top Level Project, with plenty
of binding votes (7). Please see
It appears that the update of status of log4php wasn't done
correctly. The site-publish/projects/log4php.html was updated instead
of site-author/projects/log4php.xml
It looks like carnold did the update. Is it possible that the site-
author/projects/log4php.xml wasn't checked in? The right
Hi Jean,
On May 12, 2007, at 4:56 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
I have a slightly different view of this.
The phrase I survived the Incubator and all I got was this
lousy T-
shirt seem incongruous, and combining them doesn't quite work. I
survived... stands alone
I hope I don't get into the habit of replying to my own emails.
Why not?
On May 12, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
One substantive comment: Under the recommendation vote, I don't
think a Mentor should start the vote in the community. It should
be one of the PPMC members.
I
+1
Craig
On May 8, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Dear Incubator,
The OpenJPA podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending
the attached draft board resolution.
The vote will end in 72 hours, 2300
Dear Incubator,
The OpenJPA podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending
the attached draft board resolution.
The vote will end in 72 hours, 2300 hours PDT Friday 11-May-2007.
[ ] +1 Recommend to the board to
/7/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The guides/graduation.html is absent from the left navbar. If you
update the stylesheet so it appears there, then I'm ok with
removing
it. Maybe it belongs as a sub-bullet under Podling Guides as the
last
entry.
it's just a draft ATM (which
Hi Robert,
On May 7, 2007, at 12:04 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 5/7/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
+1 for getting this going.
My only concern is the slightly ambiguous #7. I don't know that there
is a standard layout for releases. It sure would be nice
The vote in the OpenJPA community to graduate from the incubator to a
new top level project has completed. The vote thread can be viewed at
[1] starting with message [2].
The next step is to prepare a vote for the incubator.
+1 votes were recorded from:
Craig Russell
Patrick Linskey
Marc
[X ] use standard repositories
[ ] relocate repositories under /www.apache.org/dist/incubator
On May 6, 2007, at 4:57 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
incubator distributions need to be stored under /www/www.apache.org/
dist
AFACT there are two reasonable options: either create repositories
+1 with one comment.
The guides/graduation.html is absent from the left navbar. If you
update the stylesheet so it appears there, then I'm ok with removing
it. Maybe it belongs as a sub-bullet under Podling Guides as the last
entry.
Craig
On May 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, robert burrell
Hi Robert,
+1 for getting this going.
My only concern is the slightly ambiguous #7. I don't know that there
is a standard layout for releases. It sure would be nice.
I really hate to bring up maven since the subject is clearly non-
maven, but I expect many projects to build the source and
+1
Craig
On May 3, 2007, at 1:12 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
Thanks,
Brett
(OpenEJB Mentor)
Establish Apache
Actually, the list is just a bit out of date with regard to the list
on committers/board/committee-info.txt. I believe that the list on
the web site is not the authority, but the file that all committers
have access to is authoritative.
I'll update it shortly, but for now suffice to say
I'm looking to complete the last open item on OpenJPA's incubation
requirements, which is the trademark search. I've seen several
unresponded messages over the past two years that no one can seem to
find the free search button on nameprotect.com. I have to conclude
that there is no free
.
-Matthias
On 4/24/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking to complete the last open item on OpenJPA's incubation
requirements, which is the trademark search. I've seen several
unresponded messages over the past two years that no one can seem to
find the free search button
Hi Noel,
That was me, of course. I read the subversion manual where it states:
svn mv a b is equivalent to svn del a; svn add b so I never made the
history connection.
I learned something (hope not to forget).
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 21, 2007, at 9:21 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Matthias
Binding votes in favor:
Robert Burrell Donkin
Paul Fremantle
Davanum Srinivas
Niclas Hedhman
Carsten Ziegeler
J Aaron Farr
No 0 or -1 votes.
I'll commit the patch.
Craig
On Apr 15, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
[ ] +1 approve the patch to change escalation to graduation
When I updated my incubator trunk repository, I noticed [1] that
there is an update for site-author/projects/index.html without a
corresponding update for site-publish/projects/index.html.
I can fix this by committing the site-publish/projects/index.html
change, but I thought I'd ask if
Hi Matthias,
The trinidad.xml still refers to adffaces artifacts, e.g. a
href=http://incubator.apache.org/adffaces/;
Trinidad website/a
and
tdMailing lists/td
tddev/td
td
a href=mailto:adffaces-
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
clr% svn diff site-publish/projects/index.html
Index: site-publish/projects/index.html
===
--- site-publish/projects/index.html(revision 530505)
+++ site-publish/projects/index.html(working copy)
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@
, in svn, in jira and in mail as well.
We changed the name and we promoted the podling as trinidad (like
naming the jar artifacts).
for the infrastructure we sorta agreed to keep it.
thx,
Matthias
On 4/19/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matthias,
The trinidad.xml still refers
On Apr 19, 2007, at 3:03 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/19/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I think the adffaces.html MUST contain information that
the project changed name to Trinidad
good catch 8-)
Agree
[ ] +1 approve the patch to change escalation to graduation in
Incubator Policy
[ ] -1 don't approve the patch
I've attached the JIRA reference [1] and formatted html page [2] so
you don't need to apply the patch to see what it will do. There are
broken links because the page is not in
Hi Leo,
Please take my comments as trying to really understand your concerns.
On Apr 12, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
There's just this one little tidbit - if the IPMC votes to
*release* something, that something should then actually be
released. Release has a specific meaning and
I'm confused. The Process Description [1] seems to be clear:
The Mentor is automatically made a member of the Incubator PMC, and
reports to both the PMC and the Sponsor about your overall health and
suitability for eventual inclusion within the Apache Community (or
recommendation to
Hi Mike,
Something is wrong with the openjpa release process. Artifacts should
not be uploaded to the repository until they are voted out of the
project. Until they are ready, you should stage the proposed release,
sign it, and after you're sure it's ready to go, call for a review on
the
this to the official maven-gpg-plugin at some point).
On Apr 8, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Mike,
Something is wrong with the openjpa release process. Artifacts
should not be uploaded to the repository until they are voted out
of the project. Until they are ready, you should
of the things that gave me pause during the last
release about deploying to one location and then manually moving
the approved artifacts over to the official repository.
On Apr 8, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Other projects use the people.apache.org/~mikedd/xxx
on the
team list for the maven-release plugin). I sent him an email asking
about
it.
In any event the release plugin warrants a closer look.
On 4/8/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc,
I'll plead ignorance on this. I'd like to have some feedback from the
maven incubator experts here
On Apr 5, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well,
incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same
page:
FWIW, the two statements aren't contradictory. At least one
doesn't imply not all. The second requirement is simply a
strengthening
Hi Niclas,
On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:52 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 05:08, Craig L Russell wrote:
I have a hard time understanding how a podling can consider itself
ready for graduation without having anything worth sharing, and don't
understand what the point is of having
Hi Matt,
The last official act of the PPMC is to graduate the project from the
incubator. By that time, it should have learned how to govern itself.
While there is no policy, I believe that graduation is a good time to
take stock of the PPMC membership and committers and decide who will
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process.
+1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I
understand,
if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't
On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 23:58, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor.
Actually, according to Incubator policy [1] it's the other way
around.
Upon
On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Thanks for this discussion. So just to clarify, anyone on the
PPMC can
request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as
well
as the usual PPMC on the root email.
;-)
CU in Amsterdam ;)
-Matthias
On 4/4/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 23:58, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor
On Apr 4, 2007, at 1:54 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/4/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Also, the whole idea of the Incubator is to
withhold releases from the general public.
No, the idea of the incubator is to make
Hi Niclas,
On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 12:19, Brett Porter wrote:
The OpenEJB PPMC would like to take feedback on the following
graduation proposal before putting it to a vote by the incubator PMC.
Before voting officially on this, I would
Hi Robert,
From my reading of the incubator PPMC guide, the guide only talks
about the process up to the point where the PPMC votes to offer
commit privileges to a new member. It then links to the PMC document
that Martin refers to.
It's not documented in the PMC document how to apply
On Mar 28, 2007, at 2:22 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/28/07, George Aroush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. To
answer your
questions:
The files *.csproj, and *.sln are the Visual Studio.NET project
files --
those are
I neglected to put into the OpenJPA report that the report was
reviewed by clr, kwsutter, mprudhom, and ekoneil.
Thanks,
Craig
On Mar 26, 2007, at 7:42 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2007
Any last comments before I post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the OpenJPA status report for the board for the three month
period ending Mar 2007.
=== OpenJPA ===
OpenJPA made good progress this quarter in all areas. The project has
many active committers all driving toward improving functionality,
stability, performance, and usability.
Hi George,
It would be best if someone already in the Apache web of trust you
know personally, or who can meet you in person and verify your
bonafides would volunteer to sign your key. There are half a dozen
people in the Mass Bay Area according to the map below [1].
By the way, there is
Hi George,
I'm not in a position to either approve or veto your release, but
without anyone in Apache signing your pgp key it looks bad.
You might try contacting the half-dozen Apache folks in Boston
directly by email, or see if anyone on this incubator list is willing
to sign your key.
Yoav, you are a mensch.
Craig
On Mar 18, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
George: +1 (binding) to you releasing right away.
I live in the Boston area and am always available to meet up, say hi,
and sign your PGP key if you so desire.
Yoav
On 3/18/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL
Also straddling the fence, but have thought about this a lot. After
seeing the release process for incubating projects, I'd say that they
get sufficient scrutiny compared to TLP releases. So we're not
putting Apache in a bad legal position by releasing incubating
software. The only danger
On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 3/16/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 3/16/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is everyone in ASF willing to be comfortable with the ASF stamp of
approval on a project that might still be in the process of
On Mar 16, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
And remember that the release early, release often mantra can not
be applied on podlings, given the pain to release a project in
incubation.
I have a very different take on this. If a podling has difficulty
releasing as often as they
IANAL, but I have some experience with TCKs.
You should be fine with releasing CXF as long as you don't claim
compliance with a JSR whose TCK you don't pass. You would want to
carefully review the documentation to make the non-compliance clear
wherever the relevant JSRs are mentioned.
So
Hi George,
On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:45 AM, George Aroush wrote:
Hi Craig,
I have been reading http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html and
Googled about the public-key. What I haven't been able to figure
out is how
to create the public-key
You create your private key and public key
On Jan 29, 2007, at 5:26 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 1/28/07, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 2:26 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 1/25/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Only votes cast by (P)PMC members are binding. If the vote is
Hi George,
You should upload your public GPG key to a well-known GPG server such
as http://pgp.mit.edu/. You will also need to put your key into the
KEYS file in the release directory.
Other resources you might look at include
http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html
Hi Noel,
Thanks for the additional insights.
I'm trying to help set expectations for new podlings as they enter
Apache and there appear to be some holes I'd like to patch. Please
take this as an offer to help, and not criticism.
On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig
On Feb 19, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 2/19/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Your quarterly report mentions possibly legal issues related
to crypto.
What are the issues?
We need to file a export notification
issue today!
Craig
On Feb 16, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Brian,
On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
-1 (NOT binding)
The document still contains
On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have been recorded from each
501 - 600 of 696 matches
Mail list logo
