Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache AsterixDB - JDBC Driver

2021-09-08 Thread David Jencks
this conversation. David Jencks > On Sep 7, 2021, at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Hi Till > > fwiw I think the donation is fine though the AsterixDB PMC will need to do > some due diligence in verifying ownership of code before forming a release. > This is likely what Just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

2020-05-04 Thread David Jencks
, which is the normal state of affairs for employees in the US. I don’t think he is claiming Verizon copyright on code contributed by others. David Jencks > On May 4, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I find no record of Verizon Media or its predecessor

Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

2020-02-05 Thread David Jencks
could have written the below and meant “The original code for the proposed NLPCraft project was written when the NLPCraft company was called DataLingvo”. Hope this is not just noise… david jencks > On Feb 5, 2020, at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> The original

Re: Some interesting incubator stats

2019-11-14 Thread David Jencks
Nice to see, thanks! If you automate this or do it again I’d like to see e.g. … - Of the podlings that joined in 2017 4 have graduated and 1 has retired Thanks again David Jencks > On Nov 14, 2019, at 6:02 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Here’s some interesting

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-13 Thread David Jencks
What’s a “vanity mentor“? How do I recognize one before a podling has a significant history? Who is currently accepting these vanity mentors and how would they stop doing so? Hindsight is 20-20... I have no crystal ball. David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 13, 2019, at 5:10 PM, Jus

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

2019-08-12 Thread David Jencks
will be dragging the project down and pushing it away from Apache. Are you still sure?” Why not just ask them directly? David Jencks > On Aug 12, 2019, at 3:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Is there a problem we are trying to solve or is this just a concern that

Re: New disclaimer text

2019-07-15 Thread David Jencks
To me, v2 implies an improvement over its predecessor and an expectation that eventually it will universally replace said predecessor. Perhaps DISCLAIMER-b.txt DISCLAIMER-x.txt might avoid this implication? David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 15, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wr

Re: Voting on releases with serious unaddressed issues

2019-03-30 Thread David Jencks
David Jencks > On Mar 30, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 6:26 PM Wade Chandler <mailto:wadechand...@apache.org>> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 22:34 Justin Mclean >> wrote: >> >>&g

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

2018-12-30 Thread David Jencks
I like this couchdb text a lot except please actually invite the recipient instead of indicating a desire to perhaps do so at some indefinite time. E.g. > The Apache CouchDB Project Management Committee (PMC) hereby invites you to > become a committer. David Jencks Sent from my

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-13 Thread David Jencks
coordinates be? Thanks David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2018, at 5:23 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote: > > I think this is reasonably enough for this release. > > We should keep an eye on it and probably someone can upload a fixed release > to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-11 Thread David Jencks
ss has been made on this issue, has the jar been removed from the new RC? I just scanned a couple of the links below but didn’t see any mention of this. david jencks > On Feb 9, 2018, at 1:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi all,

Re: Apache Policy Quiz

2018-01-24 Thread David Jencks
of the questions I thought there was a mismatch between my understanding of Apache policy and any of the possible answers presented, and I ended up feeling vaguely insulted. David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 24, 2018, at 9:03 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Every

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

2018-01-24 Thread David Jencks
This is all ALv2 licensed. Some Felix subprojects can be configured to use unmodified equinox (the eclipse OSGI framework implementation) for testing as well as the Felix framework implementation. As far as I know no Felix subprojects depend on any equinox jars for non-test purposes. [snip] david jencks

Re: Machine Learning in METRON

2017-02-18 Thread David Jencks
ebsite and also explain why the instructions I found are at GitHub rather than apache. david jencks > On Feb 18, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Casey/Sergio: > > > i appreciate the plethora of documentation on maintaining licenses..lookin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread David Jencks
I didn’t vote here, but I rarely indicate my vote is binding although it usually is. Checking here which votes are binding would have taken quite a while…. perhaps in the future asking people to indicate if their vote is binding would help. thanks david jencks > On Nov 21, 2016, at 10:30

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

2016-01-20 Thread David Jencks
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 8:32 AM, James Malone <jamesmal...@google.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > The Dataflow programming model has been designed with simplicity, > scalability, and speed as key tenants. s/tenants/tenets? david jencks

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

2015-11-03 Thread David Jencks
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > > On 11/02/2015 09:50 AM, David Jencks wrote: >> I haven’t looked at what they are doing and don’t expect I will. However, >> I’m assuming that jira changes all get to the dev list,

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

2015-11-02 Thread David Jencks
n’t looked at what they are doing and don’t expect I will. However, I’m assuming that jira changes all get to the dev list, as in all other projects I’ve worked on. I don’t see the point in duplicating a proposal between a jira issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0-RC3

2015-03-21 Thread David Jencks
I thought the more-up-to-date version of the backport stuff was here: http://backport-jsr166.sourceforge.net/ david jencks On Mar 21, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan dsetrak...@apache.org wrote: --089e0112c408e2ec4c0511c9d829 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

2014-11-13 Thread David Jencks
remember something about the sun implementation but for some reason it was not in a form I could learn anything from). thanks david jencks On Nov 13, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Hal Lockhart hal.lockh...@oracle.com wrote: Abstract OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the development

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

2014-02-09 Thread David Jencks
I agree with Joe, voting on a moving target is not going to produce a result anyone can look back on and understand. Chris, you may be able to understand what is happening but I'm having trouble from my attempts to follow this thread. thanks david jencks On Feb 9, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Joseph

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

2013-03-20 Thread David Jencks
-applications/oracle-database-solutions david jencks On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan srikanth.sundarra...@inmobi.com wrote: Hi Justin, I am assuming it won't be an issue as Falcon used within the Adobe/Apache Flex isn't related to Hadoop. Regards Srikanth Sundarrajan

Re: UMA Implementation

2012-07-05 Thread David Jencks
to provide a CLA (see http://www.apache.org/licenses/ ) and your employer may need to provide a CCLA. thanks david jencks On Jul 5, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, Suleman. Thank you for your interest to contribute UMA code into Apache Amber project. You cannot directly commit

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP

2012-02-08 Thread David Jencks
+1 david jencks On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi... It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or not, [1], [2] and [3]. In the past few weeks there has been

Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

2010-11-17 Thread David Jencks
+1 (with the one required mentor/IPMC vote and notifying private@) david jencks On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Glen Daniels wrote: +1 from me. I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be OK with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone

Re: [VOTE] Apache SIS 0.1-incubating Release Candidate #2

2010-11-10 Thread David Jencks
I agree with ant that you should clean this up before releasing. frustrating but worthwhile. I also agree with what he thinks should be removed. thanks david jencks On Nov 10, 2010, at 2:12 PM, ant elder wrote: On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm

Re: podling reporting

2010-09-05 Thread David Jencks
found relates to keeping a page tracking those steps that up to date. Maybe it would be better to call the page mentioned in the link you found the status page and the stuff that goes to the board a status report? thanks david jencks On Sep 5, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: There's

Re: Name change from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework

2010-08-27 Thread David Jencks
it clarifies the scope and includes a branding word. thanks david jencks -Grant - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Name change from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework

2010-08-26 Thread David Jencks
here). It seemed to pass muster until a week later, a fair amount of time after we went and made the changes. I responded within 5 hours of the proposal. AFAICT the PPMC members have not responded to that post at all. thanks david jencks Upayavira On Aug 25, 2010, at 7:42 AM

Re: Name change from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework

2010-08-24 Thread David Jencks
). To be blunt I think this is a really bad name and feels to me a bit like a land grab. thanks david jencks On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:38 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Pid * wrote: Isn't

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

2010-08-17 Thread David Jencks
david jencks On Aug 16, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Also, just noticed that the SVN tree does not appear to have a copy of the LICENSE file. Normally this is stored alongside the NOTICE file at the top-level, i.e

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

2010-08-17 Thread David Jencks
On Aug 17, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:09 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Dunno if it's exactly documentation but see this from Roy Fielding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26?page

Re: Incubator Board Report - August 2010

2010-08-16 Thread David Jencks
Sorry for the lateness, as one of the Amber mentors I would like to sign off on the amber portion of this report. thanks david jencks On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Matt Benson, Srinath Perera, and Michael McCandless all joined the Incubator. Several more

Re: Name change from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework

2010-08-16 Thread David Jencks
it was some kind of generalization of the transport connectors for a web container. Since this now or formerly relates to lucene I kinda doubt either one of these assumptions would be particularly accurate. thanks david jencks On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:59 AM, karl.wri...@nokia.com karl.wri

Re: Retired/dormant projects

2010-06-11 Thread David Jencks
anything significant happened here, it has continued at codehaus. Read-only or removal would be appropriate. david jencks tell; no updates to SVN since end of 2005 Should their SVN directories be made read-only

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-07 Thread David Jencks
+1 (not yet binding?) thanks david jencks On May 4, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Shindig PMC for a new Amber podling. The goal is to build a community around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

2010-05-01 Thread David Jencks
Also if Amber needs more mentors I can apply to join the incubator pmc and be an additional mentor. thanks david jencks On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:43 PM, David Jencks wrote: I'm interested in implementing jaspic (jsr 196) support if practical. This should allow Amber to provide container

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

2010-04-29 Thread David Jencks
module makes sense. I've added myself to the initial committers list hopefully this is the appropriate way to express my interest :-) thanks david jencks On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Paul Lindner wrote: Hi Pablo, If you are considering merging Scribe with Amber I would add yourself

Re: Branding of Incubator projects

2006-06-26 Thread David Jencks
the incubation status clear. thanks david jencks Podling has been approved to graduate from the incubator: Formal press release, issued by the ASF. Or jointly by the ASF and any affiliated organizations/groups. Susan

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

2006-03-14 Thread David Jencks
I'm not sure what is going on with that, I have commtted work to AMQ although it has been quite a while. Why are you looking only at the branches? And in particular why not include amq 4? thanks david jencks On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Hmmm... svn log svn

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

2006-03-13 Thread David Jencks
is to basically get everyone used to working more closely together, and when we have verified that this is happening, we can bring all the activemq people on board into geronimo. I don't see how a PPMC is going to help this process: it looks to me as if it will get in the way. thanks david

Re: BPEL contribution from Sybase

2006-02-13 Thread David Jencks
innovation. I hope you can clarify what you mean. thanks david jencks --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BPEL contribution from Sybase

2006-02-13 Thread David Jencks
I'd like to retract this email. I have doubts on both sides of this and may try to explain them in a clearer way in another message. My apologies david jencks On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:26 PM, David Jencks wrote: After being nervous for quite a while I have come to think that the sybase bpel

Re: Proposal for a centralized Eclipse update manager site for Apache projects/software

2005-05-03 Thread David Jencks
I'm not really familiar with eclipse. Could you please explain what advantages your proposal has over building your project with maven? From your description I would guess that using maven as your build system provides all the features you want with more automation. many thanks, david jencks

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Geronimo from Incubator and recommend as top-level project

2004-05-21 Thread David Jencks
[ ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements for incubation and will be recommended to the board for TLP status +1 Many thanks for all the assistance from the Apache veterans. David Jencks

Re: moving JAM to org.apache.jam

2004-03-26 Thread David Jencks
of multiproject projects rather easy to set up, but mavenizing the rest of the xmlbeans build could be a challenge. Not that I am any kind of expert, but I would wait to try to make a separate project until it has more explicit contributors. thanks david jencks Thanks again, -Patrick

Re: [HEADSUP] New Incubator site in CVS

2003-10-16 Thread David Jencks
clearer and more visible. david jencks On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 11:17 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: I have finished porting all the old site to the new layout. The site source is under the incubator CVS, and the layout has been changed to make it shallower and all docs are under