Re: [VOTE] Weex to enter the Apache Incubator

+1 2016-11-25 16:50 GMT+08:00 John D. Ament : > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:47 PM Edward J. Yoon > wrote: > >> Greetings! >> >> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the >> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

Changing project's name is not a easy decision, especially it will destroy the compatibility, all of SDK package namespace will switch to a new one, A lot of the client applications need to be modified. Later, BonoLv will raise one thread to discuss changing the project's name. 2016-11-22 12:20

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

@Niclas @Stephan Sorry for missing you in the mentors list. Later, we will add you two into the mentors list. I have added your two guys into proposal two month ago, but in the last several weeks, we have discussed a lot of things about proposal, this section has been overwrite. Sorry for that.

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (no binding) More 100 companies are using RocketMQ(Please refer to "who are using RocketMQ " https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/issues/1), I definitely believe it can provide a good solution to stable deliver and receive message 2016-11-11 10:28 GMT+08:00 冀全喜 <729040...@qq.com>: > +1 > > >