On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 29.10.2012 15:22, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of
>> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
>> Bloodhound PPMC.
>>
>> The resul
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, "Gary Martin" wrote:
>>...
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
> UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>> [
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> And here we return to a thread of some weeks ago. One chair can't
>> review all those reports and push the bounce buttons. Some other
>> people have to step up to help.
>
> This Board
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> On Jan 7, 2012 4:24 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
>>> ...
>>> The original developers are not ambivalent to this fork.
>>
>> Untrue. Christian and Remy are, and always have been, supportive.
Agreed: we don't (and shouldn't) encourage hostile forks at the ASF.
This isn't a hostile fork.
>From the beginning, the intention of Bloodhound has been to be to use
the existing Trac system as much as possible and to improve upon it.
After many private (and some public) conversations with severa
hound to join the Incubator
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Hyrum K Wright
>> wrote:
>> > ...I don't know what the proper procedure for vote counting is...
>>
>> Usually you just change the subject to [RESULT][VOTE]... to m
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call
> a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache
> Incubator.
>
> The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call
> a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache
> Incubator.
>
> The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also
Booth, WANdisco
* Mark Poole, WANdisco
* Hyrum Wright, WANdisco
* John Chambers, WANdisco
* Gary Martin, WANdisco
* Gavin McDonald, Independent
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
Hyrum K. Wright
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Hyrum K. Wright
* Greg Stein
== Sponsoring E
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2011 1:30 PM
>> To: Hyrum K Wright
>> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; Ian Wild
>>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2011 3:12 AM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>> wrote:
>> > By it's own recognition, however, the development com
on't hurt...
It would surprise me if this question isn't already answered. In fact, it is:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
I humbly submit that reopening the question with legal-discuss@ would
be disrespectful of their time.
-Hyrum
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 20
s
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> so this is basically Trac ++ and a fork of Trac ?
>>
>> Or is it a completely rewritten new approach?
>>
>> just curious :)
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>&g
as well as on trac-dev, and
so far there hasn't been any discord.
> Or is it a completely rewritten new approach?
Bloodhound may eventually diverge from Trac, but that's up to the
communities involved.
-Hyrum
> - Original Message -
>> From: Hyrum K Wright
>&g
Hello Incubator!
WANdisco would like to propose the inclusion of a new project, Apache
Bloodhound, to the Incubator. The proposal has been posted to the
wiki[1], and is also included below. We've privately discussed this
project with a number of individuals, but would now like to get the
discuss
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Yep, makes sense. Like I told Benson, I wasn't exactly sure if the mirroring
> system were read only downstream of the Apache root sources (IOW, I thought
> we had more control then in reality we did).
>
> BTW, if someone could p
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 10:39 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> It is *very* true that Infra, Legal, and (all?) ASF PMCs will be
>>> clients/users of the tool. But are they interested in
Please note, though, that that does not reflect any official pronouncement of
the Subversion development community. However, a number of the corporate
sponsors are working toward making a summer release a reality, and we welcome
whatever help folks want to give.
Getting the ASF migration out o
On Feb 11, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for
> Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been
> handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential
> showstoppers, and
On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Missing:
>>
>>Subversion
>
> Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball
> got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted by
> t
On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>> Paul Querna wrote:
>>>
>>> httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically,
>>> they aren't based on any release.
>>
>> Were these published these on the official public we
On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>> In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
>> In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this
>> will create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is compl
On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> fyi, Subversion has been migrated into the ASF repository. About 30+
> committers have access and are beginning work within the ASF repo.
> Below, you can see the big change to switch the licensing over to the
> ASF (we were already on ALv2, so thi
On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Plan: raise an issue, and we fix it.
>>
>> Not sure what else you're looking for.
>
> I was just pointing out that if you want to do the release review
> based on an existing 1.6.
contrib/ has been removed from the packaging scripts, and won't ship with 1.7.
In other news, the box that builds the nightly tarballs is back online, albeit
with a new disk, so it'll take me a day or two to get it back up. When it
does, I'll point people there, and you can see what a typical t
On Nov 10, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>
>> Subversion client and server that doesn't use a DAV layer at all. The
>> Subversion community has never released binaries -- ever -- not do we plan
>> to.
>
> That would a
On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:59, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I certainly understand why license issues would be a concern. But I could
>>> use an education about why this particula
27 matches
Mail list logo
