Upayavira is not a good example of anonymity, as he is not.
I think his name is sometimes prefixed by Dh and he is quite open
about his identity. [1],[2],[3]
I trust the Foundation knows the true identity of rgb-es. IIRC, any
legal document signed by an incognito is not binding, and we should
have checked, feel free to tell me to RTFx)
Ian
From: Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [PMC] Starting Membership for Apache OpenOffice PMC
Upayavira is not a good example
On 4 Dec 2010, at 22:43, Dan Peterson wrote:
Ian, Isabel (and anyone else I missed), sorry about that
Dan, np, just wanted to make sure you got all the credit due.
Ian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 4 Dec 2010, at 01:50, Tad Glines wrote:
2010/12/3 Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com
The 18 binding votes:
Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris A.
Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug Cutting,
Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim
On 30 Nov 2010, at 06:52, Dan Peterson wrote:
[X ] +1 Accept Wave for incubation
Ian (non-binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
+1
Would be happy to help of you need any (and if I can find time)
Ian
On 23 Nov 2010, at 20:16, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hello all,
We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
The draft proposal is available
+1
Would be happy to help of you need any (and if I can find time)
Ian
On 23 Nov 2010, at 20:16, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hello all,
We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
The draft proposal is available at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your
IBM Uk Winchester Hursley ?
On 28 Oct 2010, at 16:42, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Which would appear to come from the UK, if that gives anyone a better
clue.
On 10/28/2010 10:15 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Sorry for the noise. A bit more information:
Caller-ID: 441962815000
On Oct
On 12 Nov 2009, at 03:16, Greg Stein wrote:
Not a strong opinion, but I think that RTC hampers the free-flow of
ideas, experimentation, evolution, and creativity. It is a damper on
expressivity. You maneuver bureaucracy to get a change in. CTR is
about making a change and discussing it. But
Openmeetings looks very interesting. I notice Red5, and see Paul
Querna asked a question. I have 2 questions for my own education more
than anything,
What's the status of OpenLazlo wrt Apache Projects? I see it has a
long list of dependencies with all sorts of licenses [1] but have no
2009/10/28 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Also, are there any problems between Red5 and Adobe in terms of
patents
on
the Flash Media Server protocols. IIRC Adobe have some patents in
this
area
but I have no idea
Oliver,
shindig-dev is going to be a better place to ask this sort of question.
General is for managing *all* incubator projects.
cc'd to Shindig (but you will need to subscribe there to see the
response :))
Ian
On 26 Aug 2009, at 15:32, okrohne wrote:
Hi,
We are thinking of providing an
On 30 Jul 2009, at 12:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Btw, it feels that wookie is quite similar to Apache Shindig - is it?
IIUC, Wookie contains Shindig to provide OpenSocial Gadget Rendering
and I would assume the OpenSocial API. Wookie also contains a W3C
gadget renderer.
Ian
votes as listed below in addition
to the 7 +1 binding votes from the podling.
Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
Ant Elder +1 (binding)
Leo Simons +1 (binding)
Sylvain Wallez +1 (binding)
I would like to take the opportunity to thank everyone who gave their
time to review
so far
Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
Ant Elder +1 (binding)
Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely
that any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this
vote as abandoned
Hi,
This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT
although we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we have
no votes from the Incubator PMC.
Votes so far
Paul Lindner +1 (non binding)
Ian Boston +1 (non binding)
There were some other non binding votes cast
On 8 Jun 2009, at 14:04, ant elder wrote:
Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy
consensus
for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this vote and
start all
over again.
However before I do that, I would like some advice from the
Incubator PMC
multiple people
at
Google I/O.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
-- snip --
These are probably not supposed to be in the source archive, they
must have
slipped trough during the build process, which does have filters
in place to
exclude them
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
applications.
Vote Thread.
On 4 Jun 2009, at 16:21, sebb wrote:
On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and
implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy
releases are liable to have problems but thank you for you
continuing patience.
Ian
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
On 11 May 2009, at 18:11, sebb wrote:
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
On 11 May 2009, at 18:11, sebb wrote:
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and
implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy
22 matches
Mail list logo
